摘要
目的:采用三点弯曲实验的方法测量3种复合树脂核材料的弯曲强度。方法:本实验使用的3种复合树脂核材料分别为DCFlowCore、Bisfil-Core和LuxaCore。每种材料各制作6个大小为(2.0±0.1)mm×(3.0±0.1)mm×(25.0±0.1)mm的矩形试件。试件在Instron万能材料测试机上测试其弯曲强度,跨距为(20.0±0.1)mm,加载速度为0.5mm/min,使用单因素方差分析对测量数据进行统计学检验。结果:3种材料的弯曲强度值分别为:DCFlowCore(137.96±9.48)MPa,Bisfil-Core(123.82±12.99)MPa,LuxaCore(110.11±10.03)MPa。统计检验的结果显示,DCFlowCore与Bisfil-Core之间(P<0.041)、DCFlowCore与LuxaCore之间(P<0.001)、Bisfil-Core与LuxaCore之间(P<0.047)均有显著性差异。结论:从本实验的结果来看,3种核材料的弯曲强度均可以满足临床需要,以DCFlowCore的弯曲强度值最高。
Objective: This study was used to evaluate the flexural strength of three kinds of resin composite core materials with a method of three-point bending test. Method: The three kinds of resin composite materials, DC Flow Core, Bisfil -Core and LuxaCore, were used in this study. For each material, six rectangular specimens (the sizes 2.0×3.0×25.0) were fabricated. The flexural strength was measured on Instron Universal Testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. Data were collected and analyzed by ANOVA. Results: Flexural strength of three materials as follows: DC Flow Core 137.96±9.48 MPa,Bisfil-Core 123.82±12.99 MPa,LuxaCore 110.11±10.03MPa. Flexural strength of DC Flow Core was significantly higher than Bisfil-Core( P <0.041) and LuxaCore( P <0.001), and Bisfil-Core was significantly stronger than LuxaCore( P <0.047). Conclusions: In this study, all three materials were found to meet the clinical need in terms of flexural strength. DC Flow Core had the highest flexural strength among three materials.
出处
《口腔医学研究》
CAS
CSCD
2005年第3期286-288,共3页
Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词
核材料
弯曲强度
复合树脂
Core materials Flexural strength Resin composite