期刊文献+

复合树脂核材料的弯曲强度性能研究 被引量:2

The Investigation of Flexural Strength Properties of Resin Composite Core Materials.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:采用三点弯曲实验的方法测量3种复合树脂核材料的弯曲强度。方法:本实验使用的3种复合树脂核材料分别为DCFlowCore、Bisfil-Core和LuxaCore。每种材料各制作6个大小为(2.0±0.1)mm×(3.0±0.1)mm×(25.0±0.1)mm的矩形试件。试件在Instron万能材料测试机上测试其弯曲强度,跨距为(20.0±0.1)mm,加载速度为0.5mm/min,使用单因素方差分析对测量数据进行统计学检验。结果:3种材料的弯曲强度值分别为:DCFlowCore(137.96±9.48)MPa,Bisfil-Core(123.82±12.99)MPa,LuxaCore(110.11±10.03)MPa。统计检验的结果显示,DCFlowCore与Bisfil-Core之间(P<0.041)、DCFlowCore与LuxaCore之间(P<0.001)、Bisfil-Core与LuxaCore之间(P<0.047)均有显著性差异。结论:从本实验的结果来看,3种核材料的弯曲强度均可以满足临床需要,以DCFlowCore的弯曲强度值最高。 Objective: This study was used to evaluate the flexural strength of three kinds of resin composite core materials with a method of three-point bending test. Method: The three kinds of resin composite materials, DC Flow Core, Bisfil -Core and LuxaCore, were used in this study. For each material, six rectangular specimens (the sizes 2.0×3.0×25.0) were fabricated. The flexural strength was measured on Instron Universal Testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min. Data were collected and analyzed by ANOVA. Results: Flexural strength of three materials as follows: DC Flow Core 137.96±9.48 MPa,Bisfil-Core 123.82±12.99 MPa,LuxaCore 110.11±10.03MPa. Flexural strength of DC Flow Core was significantly higher than Bisfil-Core( P <0.041) and LuxaCore( P <0.001), and Bisfil-Core was significantly stronger than LuxaCore( P <0.047). Conclusions: In this study, all three materials were found to meet the clinical need in terms of flexural strength. DC Flow Core had the highest flexural strength among three materials.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2005年第3期286-288,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 核材料 弯曲强度 复合树脂 Core materials Flexural strength Resin composite
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Manning KE, Yu DC, Yu HC, et al. Factors to consider for predictable post and core build-ups of endodontically treated teeth. Part Ⅰ:Basic theoretical concepts [J]. J Can Dent Assoc, 1995, 61(8):685-695
  • 2Combe EC, Shaglouf AM, Watts DC, et al. Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials [J]. Dent Mater, 1999, 15(3):158-165
  • 3Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems [J]. J Esthet Dent, 1994, 6(5):227-244
  • 4Forss H. Release of fluoride and other elements from lightcured glass ionomers in neutral and acidic conditions [J]. J Dent Res, 1993, 72(8):1 257-1 262
  • 5Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ . Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods [J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20(1):45-50
  • 6Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, et al. The reliability in flexural strength testing of a novel dental composite [J]. J Dent, 2003, 31(8):549-557
  • 7Chung SM, Yap AU, Chandra SP, et al. Flexural strength of dental composite restoratives: Comparison of biaxial and three-point bending test [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2004, 71B(2):278-283
  • 8Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites [J]. Dent Mater, 1998 , 14(1):51-6
  • 9Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation [J]. Dent Mater,2003,19(3):206-11

同被引文献27

  • 1王军,施长溪,陈天池,安宏.单体含量对树脂聚合程度和性能的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志,1996,12(3):205-207. 被引量:1
  • 2周峥,施斌.桩核粘固后不同间隔时间预备对冠方微渗漏的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2006,24(5):426-428. 被引量:24
  • 3Santini A, Ivanovic V, Tan CL, et al.Effect of Prolonged Thermal Cycling on Microleakage Around Class V Cavities Restored With Glass-Ceramic Inserts With Different Coeffi- cients of Thermal Expansion[J]. An In Vitro Study[J]. Prim Dent Care, 2006, 13(4): 147-153.
  • 4Fdbio D, Juliana MB, Laise DC. Evaluation of Apical Mi- croleakage of Teeth Sealed With Four Different Root Canal Sealers[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2006, 14(5): 341-345.
  • 5Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Asscssment of leakage in the restored pulp chamber of endodonticaUy treated multirooted teeth[J]. Int Endod J, 1990, 23(1): 28-33.
  • 6Mannocci F, Ferraci M, Watson TF. Microleakage of en- dodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and com- posite cores after cyclic loading[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2001, 85 (3): 284-291.
  • 7Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, etal. Microleakage of compomer class V restorations Effect of load cycling,thermal cycling, and cavity shape difference [J]. J prosthet Dent, 2000, 83(2): 194-203.
  • 8Genolu N. Comparison of 6 different gutta-percha tech- niques (part II): Thermafil, JS Quick-Fill, Soft Core, Mi- croseal, System B, and lateral condensation[J]. Oral surg O- ral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2003, 96 (1): 91-95.
  • 9Siegward Heintze, Monika Forjanic, Andrea Cavalleri. Mi- croleakage of Class II Restorations with different Trac- ers-Comparison with SEM Quantitative Analysis [J]. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2008, 10(4): 259-267.
  • 10D Prisco, R De Santis, F Mollica, et al. Fiber post adhesion to resin luting cements in the restoration of endodontical- ly-treated teeth[J]. Oper Dent, 2003, 28(5): 515-521.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部