期刊文献+

新经济自由主义研究中应该注意区分的若干问题

Some Problems should be Understood When We Research Neo-liberal Economics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我们学习和借鉴西方市场经济的理论和政策过程中,越来越多的人对西方新自由主义思潮给予关注,并进行了针对性的研究,但其中存在着不同程度的误解和不适当的态度,妨碍着我们正确对待新自由主义思潮。我们要区分新自由主义经济学中的合理因素和谬误成分,区分新自由主义经济学所涉及的利益和立场在不同时间、不同范围、不同对象上的差异,区分理论界与政策决策当局认识的异同、学术界认识与“华盛顿共识”的异同,区分新经济自由主义的国内政策和国外政策的异同,注意新自由主义经济政策与国家干预主义和保护主义经济政策的交替、转换和灵活运用。发展中国家学习和借鉴新自由主义经济学必须注意:要将市场化与市场自由化、全面市场化区分开,将对外开放与对外全面自由开放区分开,将市场化、产权改革与全面私有化区分开,将市场化与快速市场化和快速自由化区分开。 Since the 1980s, neo-liberal economics gradually became the mainstream, even occupying a dominant position in economics of Western countries and the economic authorities. It exerted an important influence not only on the economic development and strategic arrangement of the developed countries, but also on the development situation of global economy and the economic development in developing countries. More and more people pay close attention to the neo-liberal economics and research on the process in which China practices economic reform, studies and utilizes the experiences of theories and policies of market economy in Western developed countries. But some misunderstandings and wrong attitudes we have hinder us from properly treating the neo-liberal economics and neo-liberal idea. So this paper argues from my perspective in the hope that discussions with the theoreticians and the people who are concern with the neo-liberal economics can be made.(
作者 王志伟
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期18-25,共8页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 新经济自由主义 国家干预主义 经济全球化 市场化 自由化 私有化 Neo-liberal economics state interventionism economic globalization liberalization privatization economic policies
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1[美]约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨.全球化及其不满[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004..
  • 2[美]诺姆·乔姆斯基.新自由主义和全球秩序[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2000..
  • 3俞可平.论全球化与国家主权[J].马克思主义与现实,2004,56(1):4-21. 被引量:131

二级参考文献39

  • 1托尼·麦克格鲁,陈家刚.走向真正的全球治理[J].马克思主义与现实,2002,54(1):33-42. 被引量:142
  • 2David Held & Anthony McGrew, Governing Globalizalion,Polity Press, 2002,p305-324.
  • 3Gordon Smith & Mois Naim, Altered States: Globalization,Sovereignty, and Governance, IDRC, 1999, p27.
  • 4Susan Strange, The Defective State, Daedalus, Spring 1995, p55-74.
  • 5Herbertt Dittgen, Would without borders? Reflecfiom on the future of the nation-state,Govemment and Opposition, Vo134, No2, 1999.
  • 6Jan Aart Scholte, Global Capitalism and the State, International Affairs 73:427 - 45 ,July1997.
  • 7Paul Hirst & Grahame Thompson, Globalization and the Future of the Nation State, Economy and Society, Vo124,No.3,1995, p408 - 442.
  • 8Leo Panitch, Globalization and the State, Socialist Register, 1994.
  • 9Linda Weiss, Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State,New Left Review 225:3 - 27,1997.
  • 10John Meyer et al , World Society and the Nation- State,American Journal of Sociology103,1997.

共引文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部