“说谎者悖论”剖析——思辩逻辑是产生“悖论”的根源

Analyses of the Liar’s Paradox——Speculative logic is the source of “paradox”

思辩逻辑认为逻辑的研究对象是思维或语言;而客体逻辑则主张逻辑科学研究独立于人的认识的客观世界原本具有的客观的逻辑结构和规律。剖析“说谎者悖论”的关键是鉴别“命题”及其“真假”的标准:思辩逻辑认同语言标准;而客体逻辑则坚持客体标准。“说谎者悖论”的真相是:向壁虚构的构造者们不要物证、不顾时空地将几个同音同形然而不同义的语句叠合在一起,从而将语句的“虚”与“真假”根本不同的值纯思辩地混沌杂揉。从实事求是的客体逻辑出发,任何人构造不出任何一个在事实上满足“自我悖反”的“悖论”。

Speculative logic holds that the target of logic study is in thinking or [JP2]language, while object logic thinks that study of logic science is independent of structure and law which the objective world has. The key to analyses of the liar’s [JP]paradox is the criteria of identification of “proposition” and distinction of true from false; speculative logic consents to the language criterion; while object logic insists upon objective criterion. The truth of “the liar’s paradox” is that people who fabricate out of nothing blend some phrases with the same pronunciation and forms but different meaning regardless of real evidence and space time continuum so as to confuse totally different speculation of “empty” and “true or false” quality. Based on the facts of object logic, no one can make up a paradox which in fact meets the demand of “self paradox”.