期刊文献+

论我国自然人死亡的二元立法——冲突及其解决 被引量:1

Dual Legislation on Natural Men, Death in China——Conflict and Solve
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对自然人民事权利能力的终止,我国民法规定了自然死亡和宣告死亡。但二者毕竟有别,不能等量齐观。制度的设计必须从这一现实出发,否则,所制定的法律在理论上陷入自相矛盾,在实践中无法操作。民法通则和最高人民法院司法解释却忽略了这一点,因此有必要修改最高人民法院司法解释第25、36、37条,消除其中的弊端,协调法律之间的冲突,更好地维护各方当事人的利益,充分体现民法的公平价值。 Natural death and declaration of disappearance are stipulated about stopping the legal capacity for civil rights on natural person in Chinese civil law but there are differences between them after all, so they cannot be regarded as the same. System design must be started from this reality; otherwise, the law will fall into self-contradictory in terms of theory and cannot put theory into practice. And these are ignored by The General Rules of Civil Law and the Judicial Explanation of the People,s Republic of China. So it is necessary to amend No. 25, No.26 and No.27 of Judicial Explanation of the People,s Republic of China for privy to eliminate the disadvantages, coordinate the conflict among laws, protect the profit of different parties better and reflect the value of the civil law sufficiently.
出处 《塔里木大学学报》 2005年第2期50-52,共3页 Journal of Tarim University
关键词 冲突 最高人民法院 立法 二元 司法解释 自然死亡 民法通则 协调法律 当事人 权利 natural man legal capacity for civil rights natural death declaration of disappearance conflict solve
  • 相关文献

同被引文献6

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部