摘要
为评价非离子型造影剂Ultravist和离子型造影剂Angiografin在CT增强扫描中的不良反应,对325例使用Ultravist和1338例使用Angiografin的病人分为无高危病组、有高危病组和高龄组进行单盲对比分析,结果Ultravist在单项和总不良反应发生率上均明显低于An-giografin(P<0.001),说明其有更高的安全性。但在高龄组间无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
o compare the adverse reactions of nonionic contrast media Ultravist and ionic contrast media An-giografin in enhanced CT 325 cases were injected with Ultravist , 1338 cases with Angiografin. The patientswere divided into three groups : The normal . high risk and aged group. They were compared by single-blindstudy. The superiority of Ultravist in individuals and total adverse reactions to Angiografin (P<0. 001) wasdemonstrated. Though Ultravist is safer than Angiografin ,there is no significant difference between the twoaged grups (P>0. 05).
出处
《重庆医科大学学报》
CAS
CSCD
1994年第4期292-294,共3页
Journal of Chongqing Medical University
关键词
造影剂
不良反应
CT
Contrast medium
Adverse reaction ,controlled studyiEnhanced CT