摘要
对《商榷》一文进行了逻辑的并结合实际的分析论证。指出目前公认的但被《商榷》所指责的锌当量计算公式是正确的,而他提出的新的计算公式反而是不恰当的。他的错误在于没有认识到:现在的合金元素的锌当量系数与计算公式之间是一个完整的体系,误认为锌当量系数可以直接实验测定,而锌当量计算公式可以任意改变。本文用两种多元黄铜的金相照片的组织,检验出公认的计算公式的正确,而新公式是廖误的。
Some comment on'Discussion on the calculation Formula of Imaginary content of Zinc in the polybasic Brass' ,is made based on the logical and practical analgsis.The conventional formula for calculating Zinc-Equivalent of element which was criticized in that paper is correct,and the proposed formula is not proper.This misundestand is due to the negligence to the fact that the present Zinc-equivalent coeficients for elements and formula are in an integrated system.The mistake made by the author in that paper is that the author considered the Zinc-equivalent coeficient could determined derictly by experiment,and the formula could te changed arbitrarily.Micrography stuctures of two kinds of polybasic brass were used to demostrate that the formula proposed in that paper is improper.
出处
《铸造技术》
CAS
北大核心
1994年第6期31-33,共3页
Foundry Technology
关键词
锌当量系数
黄铜
铜锌合金
虚拟含量
Zinc-eqaivalent Zinc-equivalent coeficient Polybasic brass