期刊文献+

卡维地洛治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical observation of curative effect of carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨卡维地洛对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能的疗效和安全性。方法:将51例慢性心力衰竭患者随机分为两组,卡维地洛组26例,对照组25例。两组患者基础临床特征相似,应用彩色超声心动图测量患者治疗前、后6个月射血分数(LVEF)及左心室腔径变化,并观察患者的NYHA心功能分级、血压、心率(律)的变化。结果:6个月后,卡维地洛组的LVEF比对照组明显升高[LVEF:(46.52±6.24)%比(39.62±5.63)%],P<0.05,左室舒张末径(LVDd)和收缩末径(LVDs)均比对照组明显下降[LVDd:(52.24±6.12)mm比(58.34±6.31)mm;LVSd:(39.35±5.31)mm比(43.71±5.64)mm],P<0.05。治疗6个月后卡维地洛组患者的NYHA心功能分级改善优于对照组。结论:卡维地洛对慢性心力衰竭的治疗是有效和安全的。 Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure.Methods:51cases of chronic heart failure were divided into two groups,namely carvedilol group(26cases)and control group(25cases).Their basic clinical characteristics were similar.LVEF and change of left ventricular diameter before and after6months of treatment were measured by color ultrasonographocardigram,and the alterations of NYHA cardiac function scale,blood pressure and heart rate were also observed simultaneously.Results:Compared with the control group after6months of treatment,LVEF of carveidilol group was significantly increased(46.52±6.24%vs39.62±5.63%,P<0.05),both LVDd and LVDs were significantly shortened(LVDd:52.24±6.12mm vs58.34±6.31mm,LVDs:39.35±5.31mm vs43.71±5.64mm,all P<0.05).The improvement of NYHA cardiac function scale in the carvedilol group after6months of treatment was superior to that in the control group.Conclusion:Patients with chronic heart failure treated with carvedilol is effective and safe.
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2005年第12期1475-1476,共2页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1Simko F, Simko J. Heart failure and angiontensin converting enzyme inhibition: problems and prospectives[J]. Physiol Res, 1999, 48(1):1-8.
  • 2Bristow MR. Carvedilol treatment of chronic heart failure: a new era[J]. Heart, 1998, 79(Suppl 2):8- 12.
  • 3Michael G. Mechanism of action of beta-blocking agents in heart failure[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1997, 80(11A) :26- 32.
  • 4Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, Olsen S, et al. Comparative hemodynamic, left ventricular functional, and antiadrenergic effects of chronic treatment with metoprolol versus carvedilol inthe failingheart[J]. Circulation, 1996, 94(11):2817-2825.
  • 5Stoschitzky K, Koshucharova G, Zweiker R, et al. Differing beta-blocking effects of carvedilol and metoprolol [J].Eur J Heart Fail, 2001, 3(3) :343-349.
  • 6Packer M, Antonopoulos GV, Berlin JA, et al. Comparative effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure: results of a beta-analysis [J]. AmHeartJ, 2001, 141(6):899-907.
  • 7Arumanayagam M, Chan S, Tong S, et al. Antioxidant properties of carvedilol and metoprolol in heart failure: a double-blind randomized controlled trial [J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 2001, 37(1):48-54.
  • 8Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abrahan WT, et al. Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure[J].Circulation, 1996, 94(11) :2807-2816.
  • 9Cohn JN, Fowler MB, Bristow MR, et al. Safety and efficacy of carvedilol in severe heart failure[J]. J Card Fail,1997, 3(3): 173-179.
  • 10Feuerstein GZ, Bril A, Ruffolo RR. Protective effects of carvedilol in the myocardium[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1997, 80(11A) :41L- 45L.

共引文献2498

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部