期刊文献+

米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的对照研究

Comparative study of mirtazapine and paroxetine in the treatment of depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的临床疗效及完全性。方法:65例符合CCMD-3诊断的抑郁症患者,分为米氮平组(33例)和帕罗西汀组(32例),观察6周,疗效评定用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD),不良反应评价用副反应量表(TESS)。结果:米氮平组有效率为78.79%,帕罗西汀组为75%。两组比较差异无显著性(P>0.05),但米氮平起效快,不良反应轻。结论:米氮平是一种完全、有效的抗抑郁药。 Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine and paroxetine in the treatment of depression.Methods:65patients who met CCMD-3criterion for drepression were randomly divided into mirtazapine group(n=33)and paroxetine group(n=32).The patients in two groups were treated with mirtazapine or paroxetine for6weeks respectively.The efficacy was assessed by Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD)and the safety was assessed by treatment emergent sympton scale(TESS).Results:The effective rate of the mirtazapine group was78.79%,the paroxetine group was75%,without remarkable difference between two groups(P<0.05)。The response was rapid and side effects were slight in mirtazapine group,compared with those in paroxetine group.Conclusion:Mirtazapine is an effective and safe antidepressant.
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2005年第12期1480-1481,共2页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1苏晖,高哲石.米氮平用于抑郁症的回顾[J].国外医药(合成药.生化药.制剂分册),2000,21(5):290-293. 被引量:9
  • 2Stah1 S,Zivkov M,Reimitz PE,et al.Metanalysis of randomized,dou- ble- blind,placebo- controlled,efficacy and safety studies of mirtaza- pine versus amitriptyline in major depression[J].Acta psychiatr Scand,1997,391(1):22.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部