1999-2003年双十佳社科学报实证分析

An Empirical Analysis of the Double Ten-Best Humanity And Social Science Academic Journals from 1999 to 2003

选取22种学报为对象,对其近5年的信息量、稿件来源、基金论文、合著、作者情况、时滞、关键词、参考文献、文摘率等项展开调查,并与《中国社会科学》等中外名刊进行比较。统计结果表明,双十佳学报刊均年载文量137篇,2/3的稿件来自本校,93.83%的稿件源于高校;基金论文比9.73%;合作度1.23,合著率19.31%,高职称、高学历著者占80.81%;时滞176天,篇均关键词3.5个;平均引文量7.37条,其中引用图书占72.88%,期刊占20.63%;年平均文摘率15.90%。相比较而言,双十佳学报在发文量、审稿时间、标准化著录等方面有一定优势。

In comparing with prominent academic journals at home and abroad such as China Social science, the author has done a research work on 22 Double Ten-Best Humanity And Social Science Academic Journals and has analyzed their volume of information, sources of articles, fund-aided papers, co-authored papers, authors' information, publication time lag, keywords, references, and abstract ratio in the latest 5 years. The resulting statistics show that, in average, each of these journals published yearly 137 papers, of which two-thirds are from the publishers' own universities and 93.83% from colleges and universities. The ratios of fund-aided papers, collaboration, co-authoring and authors with higher professional titles or academic degrees are respectively 9.73%, 1.23%, 19.31% and 80.81%. Publication time lag is 176 days. In average also, each paper has 3.5 key words and 7.37 quotations with 72.88% from books and 20.63% from journals. The annual ratio of abstract is 15.90% for theses journals. Comparatively speaking, these Double Ten-Best Humanity And Social Science Academic Journals are better qualified in number of published papers, shorter proofreading time and publication standardization.