期刊文献+

黄土丘陵区侵蚀土壤质量评价 被引量:69

Quality assessment of erosion soil on hilly Loess Plateau
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过建立侵蚀土壤质量单因素评价模型和综合评价模型,选出了黄土丘陵区适宜的侵蚀土壤质量评价方法,定量评价了该区土地利用方式对土壤质量的影响。结果表明,采用加权综合法对土壤质量进行综合评价能够较好地反映土壤质量的实际情况,敏感地反映土地利用方式变化对土壤质量的影响。应用因子分析法所筛选的8项土壤质量简化评价指标能够很好地反映29项综合评价指标的信息,评价结果具有较高的代表性。拟定了黄土丘陵区侵蚀土壤质量分级标准,将研究区土壤质量分为5级。黄土丘陵区10种土地利用类型间土壤质量差异显著,以天然乔木林地土壤质量最佳,属1级;其次是天然灌木林地和大棚菜地,土壤质量属2级;天然草地土壤质量属于3级,人工乔灌林地土壤质量接近3级;人工草地、撂荒地、农地和果园土壤质量属于4级。 Through establishing single factor and integrated assessment models, suitable assessment method for erosion soil quality on hilly Loess Plateau was selected. Quantitative assessments of soil qualities in different land utilization types was also performed in this paper. The results showed that soil quality evaluation with weighted integrated method could preferably reflect the actual situation of assessed soils and effects the variation of land utilization on soil quality (sensitively.) The 8 simple soil quality indicators screened out by factor analysis reflected the information of 29 soil (integrate) assessment indicates well and results of assessment be of high representative. Furthermore, the criteria of (classification) for erosion soil quality were studied out. Soil quality of research area was classified into 5 grades. The (research) results also (indicated) that soil quality on the hilly Loess plateau was significantly different due to different land utilization types. Soil quality in natural forestland was the best and was classified into should belong to grade 1. Soil quality in natural shrub land and green house was classified into grade 2. The next one was natural grassland and its soil quality grade was 3. Soil quality in planted woodland and shrub land was close to grade 3. Planted grassland, revegetated grassland, cropland and orchard had a soil quality of grade 4.
出处 《植物营养与肥料学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期285-293,共9页 Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40301028 40401026) 中国科学院"西部之光"人才培养计划项目 中国科学院知识创新项目(KZCX1-06)资助。
关键词 土壤质量 评价模型 土壤质量分级 黄土丘陵区 soil quality soil quality assessment models soil quality classification hilly Loess Plateau
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1John J B, Thomas B M, Douglas L K et al. Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: I. Central and southern high plains[J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2000, 64: 2115-2124.
  • 2John J B, Thomas B M, Douglas L K et al. Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: Ⅱ. Northern mississippi leess hills and palouse prairie [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2000, 64: 2125-2135.
  • 3Filip Z. International approach to assessing soil quality by ecologicallyrelatedbiological parameters [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystens & Environment, 2002, Special Issue, 88(2): 169-174.
  • 4Herrick J E. Soil quality: An indicator of sustainable land management[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2000, 15(1): 75-83.
  • 5Webb K T, Wang C, Astatkie T, Langille D R. Spatial and temporal trends in soil properties at a soil quality benchmark site in central Scotia [J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2000, 80: 567-575.
  • 6Carter M R, Sanderson J B. Influence of conservation tillage and rotation length on potato productivity, tuber disease and soil quality parameters on a fine sandy loam in eastern Canada [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2001, 63(1-2): 1-13.
  • 7郭旭东,傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明,李俊然.低山丘陵区土地利用方式对土壤质量的影响——以河北省遵化市为例[J].地理学报,2001,56(4):447-455. 被引量:159
  • 8胡金明,刘兴土.三江平原土壤质量变化评价与分析[J].地理科学,1999,19(5):417-421. 被引量:58
  • 9胡月明,万洪富,吴志峰,吴谷丰,李华兴.基于GIS的土壤质量模糊变权评价[J].土壤学报,2001,38(3):266-274. 被引量:83
  • 10贺秀斌,郑粉莉,李占斌,张成娥,唐克丽.林地开垦土壤质量的结构性指标响应[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(1):110-112. 被引量:2

二级参考文献107

共引文献1041

同被引文献1047

引证文献69

二级引证文献1049

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部