期刊文献+

广州市505名初中学生认知曲解与暴力倾向的关系研究 被引量:5

Correlations of Cognitive Distortion and School Violent Behaviors Among 505 Middle School Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析广州市初中生认知曲解与暴力倾向的联系,为学校开展心理健康教育及预防校园暴力事件的发生提供理论依据。方法采用认知曲解量表和校园暴力倾向量表,对广州市初二年级学生505名进行问卷调查。结果男生认知曲解程度及暴力倾向程度均较女生高;父亲文化水平居中的学生勒索行为因子程度较其他学生高;母亲文化程度高的学生强迫行为因子程度较其他学生高;学习成绩差的学生负向思考因子程度最高,学习成绩优秀的位居第2;认知曲解程度与暴力倾向程度各因子均存在正相关。对校园暴力行为发生预测作用最强的是自我中心,性别、学业成就、责备他人、母亲文化程度次之。结论认知曲解程度与暴力倾向程度各因子均存在正相关,因此可以有针对性地对有认知曲解的学生加强心理教育,预防及控制暴力行为的发生。 Objective To study the correlations of cognitive distortion and school violent behaviors among middle school students in Guangzhou, and to provide basis for school mental health education and school violent behaviors prevention. Methods Two questionnaires about cognitive distortion and school violent behaviors were conducted among 505 junior middle school students in Guangzhou. Results Boys cognition distortion and violence tendency were higher than girls. Higher scores of extort and obsessive compulsory were respectively found in the students with fathers average educational level and the students with mothers' higher educational level. The highest score of negative thoughts was among the students with poor academic achievements, then was the students with excellent academic achievements. Cognitive distortion positively correlated to violent behaviors. The leading factors to predicting school violence were self-centeredness, genders, academic achievements, blame and mother's educational background. Conclusion Cognitive distortion positively correlates to violent behaviors. Mental education should be strengthened to prevent school violence.
出处 《中国学校卫生》 CAS 北大核心 2005年第5期373-375,共3页 Chinese Journal of School Health
基金 广东药学院校级课题资助项目
关键词 认知不协调 暴力 相互影响分析 学生 Cognitive dissonance Violence Transactional analysis Students
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1翁里,吴海霞.校园暴力犯罪的侦防策略研究[J].浙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2001(5):52-59. 被引量:6
  • 2岳冬梅,李鸣杲,金魁和,丁宝坤.父母教养方式:EMBU 的初步修订及其在神经症患者的应用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(3):97-101. 被引量:691
  • 3高金桂.校园暴力之现况与型态[A]..收录于台湾师范大学所编中小学校园暴力的防治[C].台北市:教育资料馆,1993.68—72.
  • 4Farell AD, Meyer AL. The effectiveness of a school-based cur-riculum for reducing violence among urban sixth-grade students[J~ .American Jouranl of Public Health, 1997, 87:979 -984.
  • 5蔡德辉,杨士隆.学生暴力行为之分析与防治对策[J].教师天地,1996.82:9—11.
  • 6张进城.国中暴力行为学生影响因素之调查研究[J].台湾教育资料文摘,1983,12(2):108—143.
  • 7刘 晖.未成年人不良行为的预防与矫治[J].河南公安学刊,2000,4:56—58.
  • 8Marshall HH, Weinstein RS. Classroom factors affecting student' self-evaluation: an interactional moldel [ J ] . Review of Educational Research, 1984, 54:301 -325.
  • 9Cotton NU, Resmick J, Browne DC, et al.Agression and fighting behavior among African-American adolescents: individual and family factors [Jl .American Journal of Public Health,1994, 84: 618-622.
  • 10Perry. DG, Perry LC, Boldizar JP. Outcome value and aggression[J] .Child Development, 1989, 60: 571- 579.

共引文献73

同被引文献40

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部