期刊文献+

疲劳—维修交互作用下结构安全性理论的现状与展望 被引量:1

PROGRESS AND PROSPECT OF THE STRUCTURAL SAFETY THEORIES UNDER INTERACTIVE FATIGUE MAINTENANCES
下载PDF
导出
摘要 综述疲劳—维修交互作用下结构安全性理论的现状,并展望其发展方向。现有理论包括基于S—N关系的经典理论和以结构完整性为基础的现代理论,都与结构的强度退化、维修更新过程和服役的经济性相联系。获得各种检测方法的精度和裂纹检出概率模型是有待开展的基础工作;建立考虑维修效应和修后应力史变化的结构寿命周期可靠性模型是有待开展的重要工作;进一步需要发展基于疲劳短裂纹行为的新理论。 The sate of the art and prospects are presented of the structural safety theories under interactive fatigue maintenances. The classical theory by fatigue S—N relations and the fatigue crack propagation rate based modern theory are two main branches. Both of them are related to the structural strength degradation, maintenance renewal process and economical effects. A fatal item in the future is to develop the database on sensitivity and crack detected probability of various non destructive inspection methods. The structural reliability models should be developed to consider the different effects of restoring structural functions and the affects of new fatigue stressing process after repair. The most important work is hoped to develop a new theory based on the short fatigue crack behaviour.
出处 《机械强度》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期371-380,共10页 Journal of Mechanical Strength
基金 国家自然科学基金(50375130 50323003) 全国百篇优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金(200234) 教育部优秀青年教师资助计划项目(2101)资助。~~
关键词 结构 疲劳 安全 维修 无损检测 短裂纹 Structure Fatigue Safety Maintenance Non destructive inspection Short cracks
  • 相关文献

参考文献94

  • 1Freudenthal A M. Safety of structure. Trans. ASCE, 1947,112:125-128.
  • 2Freudenthal A M. Physical and statistical aspects of fatigue. Adv.Appl. Mech., 1956,4:116 - 156.
  • 3Freudenthal A M, Garrelts M, Shinozuka M. The analysis of structural safety. J. Struct. Div. ASCE, 1966,92:267 - 325.
  • 4Freudenthal A M. Reliability analysis based on time to the first failure.Aircraft Fatigue. London: Pergamon Press, Inc, 1972.
  • 5Kececioglu D, Smith R E, Felsted E A. Distribution of cycles to failure in simple fatigue and associated reliabilities. Ann. Assur. Sci, 1969.357 - 374.
  • 6Kecocioglu D, Comnier D. Designing a specified reliability directly into a components. In Proc. 3rd Ann. Aerospace Reliab. Maintain. Conf,Washington, D C, 1972.259 - 290.
  • 7Kecocioglu D. Reliability analysis of mechanical compon-ents and systems. Nucl. Eng. Des,1972,19:259 - 290.
  • 8Kecocioglu D. Designing mechanical components to a specified reliability and confidence level. Nucl. Eng. Des, 1978, 50:149-162.
  • 9Haugen E B. Statistical methods for structural reliability analysis. In Pruc. 10th National Syrup. on Reliab. Qual. Contr. ,1964.97 - 121.
  • 10Haugen E B. Probabilistic approaches to design. New York:John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1968.

二级参考文献15

  • 1傅惠民,钱若力.无损检测可靠性与寿命控制方法[J].航空动力学报,1994,9(3):227-232. 被引量:15
  • 2胡云昌,于洪洁,郭振邦,余建星.导管架式海洋平台可靠性检测与维修策略研究[J].中国造船,1995,36(3):27-36. 被引量:6
  • 3殷学纲,郭书祥.含初始裂纹结构的动态可靠性分析[J].工程力学,1995,12(2):72-79. 被引量:6
  • 4李建华.压力容器缺陷评定[M].北京:劳动部锅炉压力容器安全杂志社,1988.136.
  • 5GAO Qing. Engineering fracture mechanics. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press,1986(In Chinese)(高庆.工程断裂力学.重庆:重庆大学出版社,1986).
  • 6GAO ZhenTong. Applied statistics in fatigue. Beijing: National Defence IndustryPress,1986(In Chinese)(高镇同.疲劳应用统计学.北京:国防工业出版社,1986).
  • 7HUO LiXing. Fracture behavior and assessment of welded structures. Beijing:MechanicalIndustry Press,2000(In Chinese)(霍立兴.焊接结构的断裂行为及评定.北京:机械工业出版社,2000).
  • 8Harrison R P, Looeemore K, Milne I. Assessment of the integrity of structure containing defects(CEGB Report R/H/R6. Rev-3). Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping, 1988, 32:3 ~ 104.
  • 9Yao C C,Int J Fatigue,1991年,4卷,337页
  • 10Yang J N,Eng Fract Mech,1983年,18卷,257页

共引文献30

同被引文献17

  • 1European Vehicle Passive Safety Network 2 (EVPSN II), Report: Task 5.6-Aircraft Safety, February 25, 2004.
  • 2Taneike M, Abe F, Sawada K. Creep-strengthening of steel at high temperatures using nano-sized carbonitride dispersions. NATURE, 2003, 424(6946):294~296.
  • 3Pearson S. Initiation of fatigue cracks in commercial aluminum alloys and the subsequent propagation of very short cracks. Eng. Fract. Mech., 1975, 7: 235~247.
  • 4Yang J N, Hsi W H, Manning S D. Stochastic crack growth models for application to aircraft structures. In : Provon J W, Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics and Reliability, Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987. 171~211.
  • 5Ang A H S, de Leon D. Determination of optimal target reliabilities for design and upgrading of structures. Structural Safety, 1997, 19: 91~103.
  • 6Wircshing P H, Ortiz K. Optimal economic strategies with considerations of reliability of fatigue-sensitive structural systems. Structural Safety, 1990, 7: 199~206.
  • 7Draft ISO Standard-ISO/TC98/SC2 WG6, Documment B15. Assessment of existing structures. Int. Standards Organization, 2000.
  • 8Jeong D Y. Correlations between rail defect growth data and engineering analyses. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
  • 9API 579. Recommended practice for fitness-for-service. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute, 2000.
  • 10R5. Assessment procedure for the high temperature response of structures, Procedure R5, Issue 2. Gloucester: Nuclear Electric Ltd, 1997.

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部