试论《民法通则》第一百三十二条在医疗损害赔偿中的适用

The Applicability of Civil Law in Damage Compensation of Medical Treatment

民事法律中“公平责任”和“公平原则”在内涵上有着本质的区别,《民法通则》第一百三十二条“当事人对造成的损害都没有过错的,可以根据实际情况,由当事人分担民事责任”是“公平原则”在侵权行为法中的具体体现,具体到医疗损害赔偿中应坚持贯彻公平原则。但是目前在医疗损害赔偿案件中,有一种滥用《民法通则》第一百三十二条的现象。笔者针对司法实践中的此种现象,试图说明医疗损害赔偿案件适用《民法通则》第一百三十二条的原则。

The concepts of ' equality responsibility' and ' equality principle' in the civil law have essential differences in their connotative meaning. The stipulation' If both parties have no fault for an offense or damage, the parties should commit the civil obligation based on the real situation' (No. 132 in Civil Law) is the embodiment of 'equality principle' in the tortuous law. For the application in the damage compensation of the medical treatment, the equality principle should be carried out. However, this does not mean necessarily or unlimitedly to apply No. 132 in Civil Law.