期刊文献+

双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后稳定性的研究 被引量:4

Stability of hard tissue after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and setback
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:主要探讨BSSRO后退下颌骨术后骨的稳定性,了解导致复发的有关因素。方法:46例单纯下颌前突患者,不包括存在偏颌畸形的病例。所有患者于手术前一周(T1)、术后一周(T2)、术后6个月或6个月以上(T3)分别拍摄头颅定位侧位片,测量硬组织的相对位移。结果:BSSRO后退下颌骨后,使得硬组织Li点平均后退了6.5mm,B点平均后退了7.3mm,Pg点是8.5mm,Me点为9.1mm。各标志点的平均复发率为:Li点复发率为23.1%、B点复发率为24.7%、Pg点复发率为25.9%、Me点复发率为26.4%。结论:影响下颌升支矢状劈开截骨后退术后复发的因素很多,其中受髁状突的影响使得下颌骨在向前复发的过程中并不是完全的水平复发,而是水平逆时针旋转复发。复发可能与后退量存在相关关系,但需要超过一定的后退量。 Objective To discuss the stability of hard tissue after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and setback and comprehend the factors of relapse. Methods BSSRO was performed in 46 cases to setback the mandible. The patients were examined with lateral cephalometric radiographs one week before and one week after and six months or more after surgery. Results After setback the mandible, point Li had setback 6.5mm, point B had setback 7.3mm, point Pg had setback 8.5mm, point Me had setback 9.1mm. The average relapse is: Li 23.1%, B 24.7%, Pg 25.9%, Me 26.4%. Conclusion By the influence of condyle, the relapse of mandible is anti-clockwise rotation and forward, not horizontally forward. Relapse and the distance of setback have correlated relation, but had to over some definited distance.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2005年第3期320-322,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术 正颌外科 稳定性 sagittal split ramus osteotomy orthognathic surgery stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Enacar Atoner T,Torolu S.Analysis of soft tissue profile changes associated with mandibular setback and double jaw [J].Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 1999,14(1):27-35.
  • 2Clemente Panichella. Soft to hard tissue movement ratios:Othognathic surgery in a Hispanic population [J].Int Adult Orthognath Surg, 2000,15:255.
  • 3王友山,杨学文,东耀峻.正颌外科术后畸形复发的生物学因素及其防治[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1996,31(3):188-190. 被引量:11
  • 4Komori E,Sapara N,Aigase K.A method for evalaluating skeletal relapsing force during maxillomandibular fixation after orthognathic surgery:a preliminary report [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1991,100:38-46.
  • 5Crawford JG, Stoelinga PJW, Blijdorp PA, et al. Stability after reoperation for progressive condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery: report of severe case[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1994,52:460-466.
  • 6Van Sickel JE,Richardson DA.Stability of orthognathic surgery:a review of rigid fixtion[J].Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1996,34:279-285.
  • 7程波,东耀峻,杨学文,李祖兵,黄群,余世斌.双侧升支矢状劈开截骨后退下颌术后骨的稳定性的研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2002,18(4):358-360. 被引量:8
  • 8赖文莉,山田一寻,花田晃治,高木律男,小林正治.下颌前突伴偏位患者正颌外科手术后的长期稳定性探讨[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2003,34(1):104-108. 被引量:5

二级参考文献22

  • 1琚泽程,徐宝华,Henk Tideman.外科-正畸联合矫治骨性下颌前突[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1996,31(3):176-178. 被引量:16
  • 2[1]Bell WH. Mandibular prognathism, in modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery. 1st edition. Philadelphia PA: Saunders company, 1992:61, 2111-2137
  • 3[2]Johnson CD, Burden DJ, Sterenson MR. The influence of dental to face midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod, 1999; 21(5):517
  • 4[3]Kobayashi T, Honma K, Hamamoto Y, et al. Effects of wire and mini-plate fixation on mandibular stability and TMJ symptoms following orthognathic surgery. Clin Orthod Res, 2000; 3(3):155
  • 5[4]Yamada K, Hiruma Y, Hanada K, et al. Condylar bony change and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients with TMD symptoms: a pilot study-using helical CT and MRI. Clin Orthod RES, 1999; 2(3):133
  • 6[5]Ghouzi J. Recurrence: mechanisms and treatment. Orthod France, 2000; 71(1):61
  • 7[6]ET Uy-Co, Yamada K, Hanada K. Condylar bony change and mandibular deviation in orthodontic patients-using helical CT and MRI. Clin Orthod Res, 2000; 3(3):132
  • 8[7]Legrell PE, Isberg A. Mandibular length and midline asymmetry after experimentally induced temporomandibular joint disk displacement in rabbits. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999; 115(3):247
  • 9[8]Ghali GE, Sikes JW. Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy as the preferred treatment for mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000; 58(3):313
  • 10[9]Bell WH, Yamaguchi Y. Condyle position and mobility before and after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies and neuromuscular rehabilitation. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg, 1991; 6(2):97

共引文献19

同被引文献37

  • 1陈嵩,陈扬熙,胡静.正颌外科矫治骨性下颌偏斜的术前及术后正畸治疗[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2005,40(1):38-41. 被引量:9
  • 2任敏,滕利,张智勇,丁波,吴国平,杨锴,卢建建,归来.下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术矫治下颌前突并发症的原因和预防[J].中国美容医学,2006,15(7):815-817. 被引量:6
  • 3高益鸣,田伟家,邱蔚六,唐友盛,沈国芳.发育性不对称畸形下颌骨生长活性的核素显像研究[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,2006,16(3):222-225. 被引量:10
  • 4周会喜,周磊,艾伟健,薛国初,刘曙光.下颌前突伴偏斜畸形患者正畸正颌联合治疗的疗效[J].实用医学杂志,2007,23(10):1534-1535. 被引量:5
  • 5Leonard M, Ziman P, Bevis R, et aLThe sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1985,60(5):459-466.
  • 6AI Bishri A, Barghash Z, Rosenquist J, et al. Neurosensory disturbance alter sagittal split and intraoral vertical rainus osteotomy:as reported in questionnaires and patients' records[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,34(3):247-251.
  • 7Teerijoki Oksa T, Jaaskelainen SK, Forssell K, et al. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,31(1):33-39.
  • 8Yamamoto R,Nakamura A, Ohno K, et at Relationship of the mandibular canal to the lateral cortex of the mandibular rarnus as a factor in the development of neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,60(5):490-495.
  • 9Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible-influence of soft tissue handling medial to the ascending ramus[J].Int J Oral Maxillofae Surg.2004,33(6):543 -548.
  • 10Nesari S, Kahnberg KE, Rasmusson L. Neurosensory function of the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy, a retrospective study of 68 patients[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg2005,34(5):495 -498.

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部