期刊文献+

浅议《合同法》格式条款制度的缺陷 被引量:2

The Limitation of Standard Terms System in Contract Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国《合同法》格式条款制度,存在以下不足:在体制方面,将格式条款的订立、效力和解释同规定在合同订立一章中,有欠科学;在订立方面,格式条款订立中条款提供方需提请对方注意的范围过于狭隘,对条款的说明义务不具有普遍性,不利于相对人利益的保护;在效力方面,存在自相矛盾、自相重复的问题。同时,仅规定条款的无效,未规定条款的可变更、撤销,有悖于合同自由原则。 There are several limitations in some provisions of standard terms of the contract law of the People's Republic of China, as follows. In terms of the structure of the contract law, it is unsuitable to put the formation, validity, as well as construction of standard terms in the Chapter Two 'Formation of Contracts'. Regarding the formation of standard terms, the scope of duty to call attention to the party supplying the standard term is too narrow. At the same time, the duty to construct standard terms isn't universal and therefore the interests of the other party can't be better protected. With respect of the validity of standard terms, there are self - contradictory and self- redundant problems. Meanwhile, contrary to the principle of entering into contract voluntarily, there is only the provision of invalidity of standard terms instead of the provision of amendment or cancellation of standard terms in Chinese contract law.
作者 傅强
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期64-67,共4页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
关键词 格式条款 立法体制 法律效力 《合同法》 中国 法律缺陷 standard terms legislative system formation of standard terms validity of standard terms
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1余延满.评《中华人民共和国合同法》总则[A].漆多俊.经济法论丛(第2卷)[C].北京:中国方正出版社,1999..
  • 2宋海萍 何志 毕献星 宋海萍 何志 毕献星.论格式合同[A].宋海萍,何志,毕献星.合同法总则判解研究与适用[C].北京:人民法院出版社,2001..

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部