期刊文献+

“是”的句法语义属性研究 被引量:6

Syntactic properties of Mandarin Chinese “SHI”
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文探讨“[是[…XP…]]”结构中“是”的句法及语义属性。文章提出界定焦点的两个语义标准:(1 )激起另项集合;(2 )表征方面具有[+对比]和[+穷尽]特征,并指出“[是[…XP…]]”结构符合(1 )和(2 )的界定标准。“是”可以看成焦点标记词,不管在分裂句还是非分裂句中,其区别仅在于焦点强弱程度的不同。焦点化实质上是一种与语用结合紧密的算子移位,这样处理可以:(1 )克服“岛阻隔”难题,(2 )避免“相对最小化效果”,(3 )符合“光杆短语结构原则”的要求。“是”在句法表征上的不同位置(C0 或T0 )主要是因为逻辑式中存在不同的焦点算子:明确焦点算子和焦点泛算子。所有焦点特征都要得到核查,用泛算子还是焦点算子,取决于所要核查特征的强弱:特征越强,越有可能用焦点算子来进行运算(在句法表征上“是”位于C0 位置) ;特征越弱,越有可能使用泛算子来进行运算(在句法表征上“是”在T0 位置)。 This paper explores the syntactic properties of SHI and the [shi [...XP...]] construction in syntactic interface conditions. Two semantic criteria have been advanced in delimiting FOCUS:(1) evoking alternative set; (2) the representation characterized by [+Contrastive] and [+Exhaustive] features. [shi[...XP...]] is in agreement with the two criteria. We argue that focalization is a pragmatic A-movement: (1)the movement of [shi[...XP...]] should obey the locality principle and it displays “Relativized Minimality Effect”; (2) the focalization is subject to “Bare Phrase Structure” rule. The notion to unify the two superficially different SHI is the abstract focus-operator: the stronger the [+FOCUS] is, the more likely the explicit focus-operator SHI will be used and shi occupies the C0 position in syntax; the weaker the feature is, the more likely the general, implicit, abstract focus-operator ASSERT will be employed, which results in the in-situ [+FOCUS] feature checking, and in this case, shi is located at T0 position in syntax.
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期192-198,240,F003,共9页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Boskovic, Z. 2000. Sometimes in [Spec CP], sometimes in-situ [A]. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J.Uriagereka (eds.). Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Horward Lasnik [C]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • 2Chao, Yuenren(赵元任). 1968. The Grammar of Spoken Chinese [M]. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • 3Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M].Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • 4Chomsky, N. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework [A]. MIT Working Papers of Linguistics.
  • 5Chomsky, N. 1999. Derivation by phase [A]. MIT Working Papers of Linguistics.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy [A].MIT Working Papers of Linguistics.
  • 7Huang, C-T. - James(黄正德). 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar [D]. PhD.dissertation. MIT, Cambridge.
  • 8Huang, C-T.- James. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences [J].Linguistic Inquiry 24/1:103-138.
  • 9Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar [M]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
  • 10Kiss, K. 1998. Identificational focus versus informational focus [J]. Language 74/2:245-273.

共引文献42

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部