结构自由主义的西方秩序观被引量：2

Structural Liberalism's Idea of Order in the West

导出

摘要结构自由主义着眼于总结和解释战后西方的政治秩序,对冷战以来西方大国之间的关系提出了许多独特的看法。结构自由主义认为,战后西方政治秩序具有以下几个特点:安全绑定实践;美国霸权的可渗透性和互惠性;半主权的、不完整的大国德国和日本;经济的开放性;独特的西方公民认同。对于这些特点,结构自由主义提出了两个层次的解释:作为深层结构的工业主义和作为直接原因的美国霸权。战后西方秩序是一种开放的、互惠的政治经济秩序,美国是其中的领导者而不是统治者。由于决定西方秩序的那些因素在冷战后依然存在,所以,西方大国并不会回复到旧的权力政治斗争中去,美国也不会走向一种帝国式的统治。 According to Structure Liberalism, postwar political order in the West has been characterized by security practice of co-binding, the penetrated and reciprocal character of American hegemony, the semi-sovereign and partial powers of Japan and Germany, economic openness, as well as identity of the west. It suggests that, while Industrialism is the foundation, the direct cause of order in the West is A-merican hegemony . To it, postwar order in the West is a kind of open and reciprocal political and economic order with the US as leader. Since the factors determining the order still exist after the Cold War, great powers in the West will not go back to traditional power struggle, and US will not step forward for imperial domi-ning the order atill exist after the COld War,great powers in the West will not go back tn traditional power struggle,and US will not step foward for imperial domi-nance.

作者宋伟

机构地区北京大学国际关系学院

出处《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期45-57,共13页 Chinese Journal of European Studies

分类号 D50 [政治法律—国际政治]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1王逸舟先生.《西方国际政治学:历史与理论》[M].,..
2See Daniel Deudney and John G. Ikenberry, " Structural Liberalism: The Nature and Sources of Postwar Western Political Order", Browne Center for International Politics, May 1996, at http://www, ciaonet, org/wps/ded01/ded01, html.
3See John G. Ikenberry, "Illusions of Empire: Defining the New American Order", in Foreign Affairs, March/April 2004, also at http://www, ciaonet, org/olj/fa/fa_maraptO4/ikg01, html.
4Niall Ferguson, Colossus: The Price of America's Empire,New York: Penguin Press, 2004.
5See Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Chapter 5 "Political Structure",Reading. Mass.: Addison-Wesley. 1979.
6See Robert W. Cox, "Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations", Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1981, pp. 126-155.
7See Robert O. Keohane & Joseph S. Nye,Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little Brown Company, 1977.
8See Daniel Deudney and John G. Ikenberry, " Structural Liberalism: The Nature and Sources of Postwar Western Political Order".
9See Daniel Deudney and John G. Ikenberry, "Structural Liberalism: The Nature and Sources of Postwar Western Political Order".
10See Mary Hampton, "NATO at the Creation: U.S. Foreign Policy, West Germany and the Wilsonian Impulse", Security Studies, No. 3 (Spring 1995), pp. 610-656.