试论我国的执行异议制度及其完善

The Execution Objection System in China and its Perfection

我国现行执行异议制度在保障执行当事人和案外第三人的合法权利方面存在的不合理性在司法实践中日益凸现。其主要缺陷表现在:审查主体规定不清,审查程序无法可循,关于“中止执行”的规定不尽合理,在处理执行异议问题上引入的审判监督程序缺乏周密的制度体系考量,在保障当事人及利害关系人的程序权利方面缺乏规定,被执行人缺乏相应的异议救济权利等。为完善执行异议制度,需从实体与程序双重角度进行设计,即为当事人创设执行异议和执行异议之诉两种救济手段。

The irrationality of the current execution objection system in protecting the lawful rights of the party concerned and a third person stands out in the judicial practice.Definition of the subject and the procedure for the legal review are vague,provisions on “ suspension of execution” are irrational,supervision procedure upon execution objection are in need of careful consideration.Also,regulations guarding the procedure rights of the party concerned and the interested party, and corresponding objection rights for the executed are all missing.In order to perfect the objection system,relief means should be founded for the party concerned for the execution objection system and for lawsuit of the execution objection.