期刊文献+

市场化程度、政府干预与企业债务期限结构——来自我国上市公司的经验证据 被引量:919

Market Development, Government Influence and Corporate Debt Maturity Structure
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以我国上市公司1 999—2 0 0 3年的经验数据为样本,实证分析了地区市场化程度对当地企业债务期限结构的影响。结果表明,企业所在地的市场化程度越高,长期债务的比重越低。进一步分析发现,上述差异主要归因于政府对企业干预程度的不同。基于此,本文分析认为,当司法体系不能保证长期债务契约得以有效执行时,“政府关系” On the basis of listed companys empirical data, this paper investigat es the effects of regional market development on corporate debt maturity of this region We find that market development degree is highly correlated with corpora te debt maturity structure, the more degree of market development, the company w ithout the relation of government cannot get the loans from the bank and the low er of corporate long-term loans proportion. Our conclusion indicates that law p rotection about creditor is very important during development of market in our c ountry, otherwise this will cause higher transaction cost and worse social capit al allocation.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第5期52-63,共12页 Economic Research Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金 (批准号为 70 4 730 5 5 ) 上海市重点学科课题<上市公司治理评级 :理论与实证>阶段性成果
关键词 上市公司 市场化程度 政府干预 企业债务期限结构 中国 Market Development Government Influence Debt Matur ity Structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1FrydmanR. Gray C.and Hessel M.《约束的界限——转轨经济学中的所有权和硬预算约束》[J].《经济社会体制比较》,(6).
  • 2樊纲,王小鲁.2001(2003,2004):《中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程报告(2001年)》,经济科学出版社.
  • 3李增泉,余谦,王晓坤.掏空、支持与并购重组——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].经济研究,2005,40(1):95-105. 被引量:676
  • 4林毅夫 载R 科斯 A 阿尔钦 D 诺斯 等.《关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁》[A].载R 科斯,A 阿尔钦,D 诺斯等.《财产权利与制度变迁》[C].上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,2000年.第377~378页.
  • 5林毅夫,李志赟.政策性负担、道德风险与预算软约束[J].经济研究,2004,39(2):17-27. 被引量:1087
  • 6周立群.中国国有企业改革理论的演进与发展[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),1999(2):2-9. 被引量:5
  • 7Alchian, A. A. , 1965, "Some Economics of Property Rights", ⅡPolitico, 30(4), 816-829.
  • 8Barclay, M. J,, and C. W. Smith, 1995a, "The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt", Journal of Finance 50.
  • 9Barclay, M. J. and C. W. Smith, 1995b, "The Priority Structure of Corporate Debt", Journal of Finance 50.
  • 10Booth L., Aivazian V., Demirguc-Kunt A., and Maksimovic V., 2001, "Capital Structures in Developing Countries", Journo2 of Finance 56, 87-130.

二级参考文献34

  • 1林毅夫 刘培林.《何以加速增长,唯解自生难题》[A]..北京大学中国经济研究中心工作论文[C].,2003..
  • 2Boycko, Maxim, Sheleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert, 1996, "A Theory of Privatization', The Economic Journal, 106, pp.309-319.
  • 3Dewatripont, Mathias and Eric Maskin, 1995, "Credit and Efficiency in Centralized and Decentralized Economies", Review of Economic Studies, 62(4), pp.541-55.
  • 4Grossman, Sanford and Hart, Oliver, 1986, "The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration", Journol of Political Economy, 94(4), pp. 691-719.
  • 5Kornai, Janos. 1980, Economics of Shortage, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • 6Kornai, Janos, Maskin, Eric and Roland,Gersrd. 2002, "Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint", Working Paper, UC Berkeley.
  • 7Li, Daokui, 1992, "Public Ownership as the Cause of a Soft Budget Constraint", Mimeo, Harvard University.
  • 8Lin, Justin Yifu; Cai, Fang and Li, Zhou. 1998, "Competition, Policy Burdens, and State-Owned Enterprise Reform", American Economic Review, 88 (2), pp.422-27.
  • 9Lin, Justin Yifu, and Tan, Guofu, 1999, "Policy Burdens, Accountability and Soft Budget Constraint", American Economic Review, 89(2), pp.426-31.
  • 10Lin, Justin Yifu. 2003, "Development Strategy and Economic Convergence," Economic development and Cultural Change, 51 (2), pp.277-308.

共引文献1755

同被引文献12730

引证文献919

二级引证文献17413

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部