期刊文献+

化疗后骨髓抑制危险因素分析 被引量:20

Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Clinical Analysis of Risk Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨化疗后骨髓抑制的相关危险因素。方法对118例实体瘤化疗患者所具有的可能与骨髓抑制相关的危险因素进行单因素分析,单因素分析中有意义的因素(P<0.05)进行多因素分析。结果单因素分析:A组肝、肾功能异常明显高于B组(P<0.05),A组曾接受放疗≥3次明显高于B组(P<0.05),A组曾接受化疗≥6次明显高于B组(P<0.05),A组年龄≥60岁明显高于B组(P<0.05)。多因素分析:高剂量化疗(OR14.13,P<0.01,参数估计2.58),高毒性化疗药的应用(OR8.86,P<0.01,参数估计2.01),KPS评分≤60(OR5.11,P<0.01,参数估计0.71),骨或骨髓转移(OR3.16,P<0.01,参数估计1.37),化疗前白细胞水平低(OR7.56,P<0.01,参数估计0.416)。结论高剂量化疗药及高毒性化疗药的应用、KPS评分≤60、骨转移、化疗前白细胞水平低,年龄、肝肾功能情况及肿瘤分期、以往有无接受化疗均与化疗后骨髓抑制相关。 Objective To analyze the risk factors of sever mylosuppression.Methods The potential risk factor related to myelosuppression was managed by univiriate analysis in 118 patients with cancers who received chemotherapy.The factors which had significance(P<0.05)were selected to be done by Logistic regression analysis.Results In univiriate analysis, the rate of hepatic and renal failure in group A was much higher than that in group B(P<0.05).The myelosuppression rate in patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy was higher than that in group B(P<0.05).In multiviriate analysis,the rate in large dose of chemotherapy was significantely increased than that in group B(parameter estimation 2.58,OR14.13,P<0.01).cytotoxic drugs,types of the chemotherapy drugs(OR(8.86),P<0.01,parameter estimation 2.01).KPS score≤60, and metastasis of the bone or bone marrow(OR 3.16,P<0.01,parameter estimation 1.37).These three factors had no significance The important risk factors of chemotherapy Conclusion The model can predictivly judge the probability of sever mylosuppression after chemotherapy.Then it can instruct the prophylactic growth factor administration.
出处 《江西医学院学报》 CAS 2005年第3期48-50,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Jiangxi
关键词 化疗 骨髓抑制 危险因素 chemotherapy myelosuppression risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Blay JY,Chauvin F,Le Cesne A,et al.Early lymphopenia after cytotoxic chemotherapy as a risk factor for febrile neutropenia[J].J Clin Oncol,1996,14(2):636-643.
  • 2Talcott JA,Siegel RD,Finberg R,et al.Risk assessment in cancer patients with fever and neutopenia:A prospective two-center validation of a prediction rule[J].J Clin Oncol,1992,10(2):316-322.
  • 3Michael Mac Manus,Kathleen Lamborn,Waqqar Khan,et al.Radiotherapy-associated neutropenia and thrombocytopenia:Analysis of risk factors and development of a predictive model[J].Blood,1997,89(7):2 303-2 310.
  • 4Coiffier B,Gisselbrecht C,Herbercht R,et al.LNH-84 regimen a multicenter study of intensive chemotherapy in 737 patients with aggressive malignant lymphoma[J].J Clin Oncol,1989,7(8):1 018-1 026.
  • 5Eric Voog,Jacques Bienvenu,Krzysztof Warzocha,et al.Factors That predict chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in lymphoma patients:Role of the tumor necrosis factor ligand-receptor system[J].J Clin Oncol,2000,18(2):325-331.
  • 6Lyman GH,Lyman CH, Dale DC, et al. Risk models for the prediction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its consequences: a systematic review and classification(abstract 5 443)[J]. Blood,2001,98:413.
  • 7Crawford J,Dale DC,Lyman GH.Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia:risks,consequences, and new directions for its management[J].Cancer,2004,100(2):228-237.

同被引文献237

引证文献20

二级引证文献184

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部