期刊文献+

“进步”浪潮中的商品泡沫:《名利场》的启示 被引量:8

Commodity Bubbles on the Waves of “Progress”: A Revelation by Vanity Fair
下载PDF
导出
摘要 克里斯托弗·林德纳对《名利场》的分析有两个缺陷。其一,他未能对小说中“进步”话语跟商品文化之间的联系做出解读;其二,他把研究的焦点放在了乔瑟夫·赛特笠身上,而在分析被商品物化了的人物的症状时几乎未提利蓓加。本文指出,利蓓加仍然算得上全书的主角,她所折射出来的商品文化现象值得重视。 Two defects can be found in Christoph Lindner’s analysis of Vanity Fair. First, he has failed to read into the relationship between the narrative of “progress” and the commodity culture. Second, he focuses his research on Joseph Sedley to such an extent that Rebecca is hardly mentioned in his analysis of the symptoms of the reified characters in the novel. Rebecca is, after all, the protagonist in the story. The commodity culture refracted from her is, therefore, worthy of the reader’s attention.
作者 殷企平
出处 《外国文学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期81-87,共7页 Foreign Literature Studies
关键词 《名利场》 泡沫 浪潮 商品文化 文化现象 小说 人物 Vanity Fair progress commodity culture William Makepeace Thackeray Rebecca
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Bunyan. John. The Pilgrim's Progress. London: Oxford UP,1949.
  • 2Harden, Edgar F. Thackeray the Writer: From Journalism to Vanity Fair. Houndmills & London. Macmillan Press Ltd., 1998.
  • 3Lindner, Christoph. Fictions of Commodity Culture. From the Victorian to the Postmodern. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. , 2003.
  • 4Sutherland, John. Introduction. Vanity Fair. By W. M.Thackeray Oxford/New York: Oxford UP, 1983.
  • 5萨克雷 杨必译.《名利场》[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1995..
  • 6Thaokeray,W.M.William Makepeace. Vanity Fair. New York: Quality Paperback Book Club, 1991.
  • 7Walter E.Houghton,The Victorian Frame of Mind:1830-1870(New Haven and London:Yale UP,1957)7—39.

同被引文献56

引证文献8

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部