摘要
《长生殿》与《桃花扇》在处理历史素材时所遵循的主导原则是不同的,前者是史为戏用,以剧统史;而后者是以史统戏,以剧述史。不过虽然两剧作者对待史实的态度即曲史观有异,但是他们都追求历史真实感和艺术真实感的交融统一。作为历史剧,《长生殿》与《桃花扇》的创作模式明显好于有违史实的翻案戏,这两部剧作代表了我国古代历史剧创作的两种主导范式。
The dominant principle between The Palace of Eternal Life and The Peac h Blossom Fan was different because the former adhered to that historical data s hould obey plot of a play but the latter held that scenario should express the a uthor's historical views. Even if Hong Sheng and Kong Shangren had different vie ws on the relationship of history and opera, their dramas were greatly successfu l because they had sense of reality in history and artistic attainment. As histo rical plays, the creative patterns of The Palace of Eternal Life and The P each Blossom Fan were better than representing operas and they stood for the t wo dominant patterns of Chinese historical operas.
出处
《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》
2005年第3期107-113,共7页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
关键词
《长生殿》
《桃花扇》
历史剧
创作模式
The Palace of Eternal Life
The Peach Blossom Fan
Historical Play
Creative Pattern