期刊文献+

论构建我国刑事诉讼证据开示制度的意义

On the Significance of the Construction of Open Evidence System in Chinese Criminal Suit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证据开示制度源于英美法系的当事人主义,体现了控辩双方在庭审前的权利对等。鉴于我国刑事诉讼模式的特点和改革开放以来公民人权意识不断增强与涉外刑事案件的不断增加的现实状况,引入证据开示制度已是十分必要。这样做,有利于实现公正与效率的法律价值,有利于消除控辩双方证据资源不平衡问题,有利于实现诉权制衡,保障被告的基本人权。 <Abstrcat> Open evidence system originated in partism of British and American legal system, which reflects the equal rights between the accusing and the defending party at court. In view of the characteristics of the model of Chinese criminal suit and with a view to the status quo of the successive awareness raising of the citizens' human rights and the successive increase of foreign criminal cases, it is necessary to introduce open evidence system. This is favorable for the realization of just and efficiency, for the elimination of the imbalance of evidence resources between the accusing and the defending party, for the realization of check-and-balance of lawsuit right, and for the safeguard of the basic human rights of the accused.
作者 付小容 赵丽
出处 《重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第2期16-18,共3页 Journal of Chongqing university of science and technology(social sciences edition)
关键词 证据开示 证据资源 人权 当事人主义 discovery evidence resources human rights partism
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1陈瑞华.英美刑事证据展示制度之比较[J].政法论坛,1998,16(6):84-95. 被引量:56
  • 2陈瑞华.程序正义论纲[A].陈光中.诉讼法论丛(第一卷)[C].北京:法律出版社,1998.33.
  • 3David Sunman: Advancing Disclosure: can the rules for Advance Information in the Magistrate's court be improved? [M]. (E)Criminal Law Review, Vol, November, 1998.
  • 4Federal Criminal Trial, 700IMp. West publishing co. 1976,.
  • 5(苏)康·维·内戈伊察.控制论的当前问题[A].王卫国.过错责任原则:第三次勃兴[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2000..
  • 6(美)凯尔逊.什么是正义[A].张文显.二十世纪西方法哲学思潮研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1996..
  • 7(美)E·博登海默著 邓正来译.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999..
  • 8(美)约翰·罗尔斯著 何怀宏译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988..
  • 9(美)戈尔丁著 齐海滨译.法律哲学[M].北京:三联书店,1987..
  • 10迈克尔·D·贝勒斯著 张文显译.法律的原则—一个规范的分析[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996..

共引文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部