期刊文献+

我国投资银行业市场结构、规模与绩效实证研究 被引量:7

An Empirical Study of the Market Structure, Scale and Performance of Our Investment Banking Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文的实证研究表明,市场结构、行业规模以及市场整体收益率对我国投资银行业的利润率有着很强的解释能力,三个因素对于净资产收益率的解释能力超过98%。从影响的相对水平来看,集中度的影响要大于市场收益的影响,规模的影响与集中度、市场收益的影响相反。进一步研究还表明,尽管行业资产规模与净资产收益率的时间序列显示随着行业资产规模的增加,我国证券公司的净资产收益率呈现出不断下降的特征,但这并不意味着我国投资银行业是规模不经济的。有关规模经济的横截面分析数据表明,现阶段我国证券公司的规模与其绩效之间并不存在着明显的关系,既没有显示出规模不经济,也没有显示出规模经济。 Empirical study indicates that market structure, industry scale and overall market profitability are very interpretive of the profit rate of investment banking industry in our country. The three factors combine to interpret over 98% of return on net assets. Measured by relative influence, concentration ratio has a bigger influence than that of market profit, whereas scale influence is smaller than that of concentration ratio and market profit. Further study shows that although the industrial assets scale and time sequence display of return on net assets are in proportion to the increase of industrial asset scale and the return on net assets of securities companies in our country is on the decrease, it does not mean that our investment banking industry is characterized by diseconomy of scale. Data from cross section analysis of scale economy reveals that there exists little noticeable correlation between the scale of securities companies in our country and their performance: e.g. neither diseconomy of scale nor economy of scale is visible.
作者 黄凌
出处 《金融论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期55-60,63,共7页 Finance Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Smirlock M.. Evidence on the (Non)Relationship Between Concentration and profitability in Banking [J]. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1985,17(1),69-83.
  • 2Douglas D. Evanoff,D.L. Fortier. Reevaluation of the structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm in Banking[J]. Journal of Financial Services Research 1, June 1988.
  • 3Ruthenberg, D.. Structure-Performance and Economies of Scale in Banking in a Unified Europe,[J]. Bank of Israel Banking Review, No. 4, June 1994, 95-114.
  • 4Goldberg, L.G. and A. Rai. The Structure-Performance Relationship for European Banking [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1996,(20):745-771.
  • 5Maudos, Joaquin. Market Structure and Performance in Spanish Banking Using a Direct Measure of Efficiency[J].Applied Financial Economics, 1998,(8):191-200.
  • 6Berger, A.N. and T. Hannan. The Price Concentration Relationship in Banking-a Reply[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 74, Feb 1992, 376-379.
  • 7赵旭,蒋振声,周军民.中国银行业市场结构与绩效实证研究[J].金融研究,2001(3):59-67. 被引量:170
  • 8秦宛顺,欧阳俊.中国商业银行业市场结构、效率和绩效[J].经济科学,2001(4):34-45. 被引量:194
  • 9于良春,鞠源.垄断与竞争:中国银行业的改革和发展[J].经济研究,1999,34(8):48-57. 被引量:345
  • 10刘伟,黄桂田.中国银行业改革的侧重点:产权结构还是市场结构[J].经济研究,2002,37(8):3-11. 被引量:226

二级参考文献45

共引文献806

同被引文献40

  • 1黎红梅.我国投资银行业的国际比较与发展出路[J].湖南省社会主义学院学报,2004(2):72-73. 被引量:2
  • 2任金芳,曾庆海,张晓琦.中美投资银行业比较及对我国的启示[J].山东工商学院学报,2004,18(5):41-45. 被引量:2
  • 3张文霖.主成分分析在SPSS中的操作应用[J].市场研究,2005(12):31-34. 被引量:313
  • 4Klepper. S.. Firm Survival and the Evolution of Oligoply[J]. Rand Jounral of Economics, 2002,33(1):37- 61.
  • 5Javanovic, MacDonald. The life cycle of a com- petitive industry [J]. The Journal of political economy, 1999(102):322-347.
  • 6张欢.中小券商涌入集合理财市场FOF成“开路先锋”[N].上海证券报,2010-10-22(A3).
  • 7Praharad C. K. and G. Hamel. The core competence of the corporation [J]. Harvard business review, 1990, May - June. 79 - 91.
  • 8Richard B, Carter 'K and Frederick H. Dark. An Empirical Examination of Investment Banking Reputation Measures. The Financial Review. Vol. 27 No. 3, August 1992, PP. 355-374.
  • 9Douglas W. Diamond, Raghuram G. Rajah. A Theory of Bank Captial. NBER Working Paper No. 7431. December 1999. JEL No. G20, G21, E50, E58.
  • 10BharatN. Anandw, AlexanderGaletovicz. Relationships, Competition and the Structure of Investment Banking Markets. The Journal of Industrial Economics 0022-1821. Vol. LIV. June2006. No. 2. P151- 199.

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部