摘要
罪刑法定原则的形式主义解释范式(大陆法系)和实质主义解释范式(英美法系)是两大法系不同制度背景下的产物,各有其存在的合理性,从而有着价值取向上的一致性。将两种不同解释范式理解为是罪刑法定原则蕴涵的价值冲突的结果,实是一种误读。
The formalist interpretation (under continental law system) and material interpretation (under Anglo-American law system) for the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime are the products of different law systems. They have their own reason to exist and are coherent in value orientation. It is wrong to interpret the two interpretation forms as the conflict of values.
出处
《政法学刊》
2005年第3期44-46,共3页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
罪刑法定
解释范式
a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime
interpretation form