期刊文献+

基于正交设计的多目标演化算法 被引量:36

A Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Orthogonal Design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出一种基于正交设计的多目标演化算法以求解多目标优化问题(MOPs).它的特点在于:(1)用基于正交数组的均匀搜索代替经典EA的随机性搜索,既保证了解分布的均匀性,又保证了收敛的快速性;(2)用统计优化方法繁殖后代,不仅提高了解的精度,而且加快了收敛速度;(3)实验结果表明,对于双目标的MOPs,新算法在解集分布的均匀性、多样性与解精确性及算法收敛速度等方面均优于SPEA;(4)用于求解一个带约束多目标优化工程设计问题,它得到了最好的结果———Pareto最优解,在此之前,此问题的Pareto最优解是未知的. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), called orthogonal multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (OMOEA), is proposed in this paper. The idea of OMOEA is that an original niche (decision space) evolves first, and splits into a group of subniches according to the output niche-population of the evolution; then every subniche iterates the above operations so as to enhance the precision of the solutions. The main component of the new technique is the niche evolution procedure which uses a generalized design method for MOPs to locate a non-dominated set like the orthogonal design and uses the statistical optimal method for SOPs to locate optimal solution. Employed orthogonal design method and statistical method, the OMOEA can converge fast and yield evenly distributed solutions with high precision. The numerical results show that above algorithm performs better than SPEA and other MOEAs for MOPs with two objectives. For an engineering MOP with five objectives and seven constraints, the new technique finds the precise Pareto-optimal solutions which is unknown before.
出处 《计算机学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第7期1153-1162,共10页 Chinese Journal of Computers
基金 国家自然科学基金(60473037 60483081 60275034 60204001 60133010) 中国博士后科学基金(2003034505)资助.~~
关键词 演化算法 正交设计 多目标优化 PARETO最优集 PARETO最优前沿 evolutionary algorithms orthogonal design multi-objective optimization Pareto optimal set Pareto optimal front
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Cohon J.L.. Multiobjective Programming and Planning. New York: Academic Press, 1978
  • 2Steuer R.E.. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. New York: Wiley, 1986
  • 3Koski J.. Multicriterion optimization in structural design. In: Atrek E., Gallagher R.H., Ragsdell K.M., Zienkiewicz O.C. eds.. New Directions in Optimum Structural Design. New York: Wiley, 1984, 483~503
  • 4Schaffer J.D.. Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms[Ph.D. dissertation]. Vanderbilt University,Nashville, Tennessee, 1984
  • 5Schaffer J.D.. Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985, 93~100
  • 6Hajela P., Lin C.Y.. Genetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design. Structural Optimization, 1992, 1(4):99~107
  • 7Fonseca C.M., Fleming P.J.. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Forrest S. ed.. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993, 416~423
  • 8Horn J., Nafpliotis N.. Multiobjective optimization using the niched Pareto genetic algorithm. Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Champaign: IlliGAL Report 93005, 1993
  • 9Horn J., Nafpliotis N., Goldberg D.E.. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway, NJ, 1994, 1: 82~87
  • 10Srinivas N., Deb K.. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3): 221~248

同被引文献414

引证文献36

二级引证文献239

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部