期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

英语写作教学中语法反馈的探讨 被引量：1

Discussion on Grammar Feedback in Teaching of English Writing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语法问题一直是外语和第二语言教学广泛关注且颇有争议的话题。论述了英语写作教学中反馈及其作用,以及有关语法改错的讨论,并提出了有效反馈的具体方法及语法在写作教学中应有的位置。 Grammar remains the concern of and controversial among researchers and teachers in the field of ELT and SLT. This article expounds previous researches and discussions on grammar correction andthe role of feedback in the process of writing, puts forward measures for language teachers to provide effective feedback, and argues for the position of grammar correction.
作者 宋铁花
机构地区 山西农业大学文理学院
出处 《山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）》 2005年第3期243-245,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
关键词 反馈 语法改错 写作教学 Feedback Grammar correction Teaching of writing
分类号 H315 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]Claudia L.Keh. Feedback in the Writing Process: A Model and Methods for Implementation[J].ELT Journal,1990,44/4: 294-304.
  • 2[2]Dana Ferris and Barrie Roberts.Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes How explicit does it should be?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing.2001,10: 161-184.
  • 3[3]John Truscot.The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes[J].Language Learning.1996,46(2):327-369.
  • 4[4]Stephen D. Krashen.Principle and Practice in Second Language Acquisition[M].Pergamon press.1982.
  • 5[5]Dana Ferris.the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott[J].Journal and Second Language Writing.1999,8(1):1-11.
  • 6[6]Ann k. Fathman & Elizabeth Whalley.Teacher Response to Student Writing: Focus on Form versus Contents[M]. In Barbara Kroll (Eds.), Second Language Writing Research Insights for the Classromm.1990.178-190.
  • 7[7]John Hedgcock.Feedback on Feedback: Assessing Learner Receptivity to Teacher Response in L2 Composing[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing.1994,3(2): 141-163.

同被引文献15

  • 1Fathrnan, A. K. & Whalley, E. Teacher response to student writing: Fo- cus on form versus content [ A 1. In Kroll, B. ( ed. ). Second ldmguage Writing Research Insights for the Classroom[ C ]. Cambridge: Cambridge U-niversity Press, 1990:178-190.
  • 2Ferris, D. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A re- sponse to Truscott [ J ]. Journal and Second Language Writing, 1999,8 ( 1 ) : 1-11.
  • 3Ferris, D. Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & impli- cations[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing,1997,6(2) :155-182.
  • 4Hedgceek, J. Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing[ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writ- ing,199d,3(2) : ld1-163.
  • 5Keh, C. L. Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for im- plementation[J]. ELT Journal ,1990,44(4) :294-304.
  • 6Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I. Salience of feedback on error and its effects on EFL writing quality[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 1986(20) :83-93.
  • 7Semke, H. I). Effects of the red pen[J]. Foreign Language Annals, 1984 (17) : 195-202.
  • 8Truscot, J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes[ J ]. Language Learning, 1996 , 46 ( 2 ) :327-369.
  • 9Truscott, J. The case for "The case against gxammar correction in 12 writ- ing classes": A response to Fen'is[ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writ-ing,1999,8(2) : 111-122.
  • 10Zhang, S. Q. Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class[ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1995(4) : 209 -222.

引证文献1

二级引证文献19

山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）
2005年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部