期刊文献+

中国上市公司独立董事制度研究 被引量:14

Research on Independent Director Institution in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 独立董事制度在中国上市公司中实施只有四年左右的时间。本文通过独立董事制度实施以来存在问题的研究,从公司治理结构与独立董事制度、独立董事制度产生的基础、股权结构与独立董事制度以及独立董事本身等方面进行了深层次探索,认为完善独立董事制度应从体制和政策调整两方面共同进行。体制方面,完善在国内外公司治理结构模式的比较分析基础上,将独立董事制度与公司治理结构结合起来。从政策调整方面,应从独立董事职责、独立董事产生机制、独立董事监管体系的形成、独立董事工作制度等诸方面加以调整和完善,以使独立董事制度发挥其真正的效用。 The independent director institution was introduced to public listed companies in China about merely 4 years ago. This article explores the problems encountered ever since the independent director institution was implemented, by considering the relationship between independent director institution and corporate governance, the origin of independent director institution, the relationship between independent director institution and stock right structure, as well as the independent directors themselves. The author believes that to improve the independent director institution, the system reform should be combined with the policy adjustments. The former measure requires that the independent director institution be integrated with the corporate governance, based on analyzing the similarity and difference between the corporate governance in Chinese companies and that in overseas companies. The latter measure requires that the relative policies be adjusted and improved considering the responsibilities of independent directors, the origin of the independent directors, the way independent directors are elected, as well as the grow - up of the supervision performed by independent directors. Only in this way could the independent director institution exert its real effect.
作者 陈颖
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第7期55-59,共5页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
关键词 独立董事 公司治理结构 股权结构 独立董事制度 Independent director Corporate governance Stock right structure System of independent director
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1Arthur, N. (2001) : "Board Composition as the Outcome of an Internal Bargaining Process: Empirical Evidence", Journal of Corporate Finance. 7, pp. 307-340.
  • 2Berle, A. ,and G. Means(1932): The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Harcourt, Brace & World. Reprint by Transaction Publishers (1997).
  • 3Bhagat, S., and B. Black, (1999): " The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance", Business Lawyer, Vol. 54, pp. 921-963.
  • 4Borna, J. A., and H. E. Ryan (2000): " Capital Expenditure Announcements and Anti-takeover Barriers", The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 40, pp. 205-228.
  • 5Borokhovich, K, A, , P, Parrino, and T. Trapani(1996):"Outside Directors and CEO Selection", Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 337-355.
  • 6Brickley, J. A. , and J. L. Coles(1994) :" Outside Directors and the Adoption of Poison Pills", Journal of Financial Economics, 35 (3), June, pp. 371-390.
  • 7Chen, C.J.P. , and B. Jaggi (2000) :"Association between Independent Non-executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong', Journal of Public Policy.Vol. 19, pp. 288-310.
  • 8Coles, J, W, , and W, S, Hesterly(2000): "Independent of the Chairman and Board Composition: Firm Choice and Shareholder Value", Journal of Management. Vol. 26, No. 2,
  • 9胡汝银.中国上市公司治理机制与独立董事制度建设[J].中国金融,2000(9):44-46. 被引量:26
  • 10李占猛,杨宏伟.美国公司独立董事制度研究[J].国外财经,2000(4):15-21. 被引量:57

共引文献41

同被引文献105

引证文献14

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部