期刊文献+

理科教师科学本质教学话语的重建 被引量:10

Reconstructing Sciences Teachers' Instructional Discourse of Scientific Essence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 培养学生适当理解科学本质观是科学教育的目标之一。传统科学本质观下的教学话语会使学生形成传统的科学本质观,容易导致学生机械性学习而非理解性学习,使学生很难具有批判性精神和创造性精神。当代科学本质观下的教学话语有可能促进学生对于科学本质的理解,有助于学生对于科学内容的理解,对学生的思维方式产生积极的影响。理科教师科学本质教学话语重建的基本策略有:反思科学本质,重建科学本质观;转变认识角度,重建认识论范式;区别观察和推论,重建跨越性话语;区别定律和理论,重建产生式话语;设计认识论主题,重建认识论话语;设计反思性活动,重建认识论反思性话语。 One of the goals of scientific education is to train students to ha v e an appropriate understanding of the concept of scientific essence. The instruc tional discourse in the traditional view of scientific essence will contribute t o the establishment of students' traditional view of scientific essence,leading students to study mechanically instead of understandingly,thus hard for studen ts to acquire the critical and creative spirits,while the instructional discour se in the view of modern scientific essence may promote students' understanding of the scientific essence,help students to understand the scientific content an d play a positive role in students' creative thinking. As to the reconstruction of sciences teachers' instructional discourse of scientific essence,we have the following strategies: reconstructing the view of scientific essence by reflecti ng the scientific essence; reconstructing the norm of epistemology by changing t he angle of realization; reconstructing the transcending discourse by discrimina ting observation and inference; reconstructing the productive discourse by diffe rentiating the laws and theories; reconstructing the discourse of epistemology b y designing the theme of epistemology; reconstructing the reflective discourse o f epistemology by devising the reflective activities.
作者 梁永平
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第7期61-64,共4页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 理科教师 科学本质 教学话语 重建 sciences teacher scientific essence instructional discourse reco nstruct
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1AAAS, American Association for the Advancement of science.Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press,1990.
  • 2Kimball, M. E. (1967-68) Understanding the nature of science: a comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110 - 120.
  • 3Abd-EI-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. and Lederman, N.G.(1998) The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-437.
  • 4(NRC) National Research Council (1996) National Science Education Standards(Washinton, DC: National Academic Press).
  • 5中华人民共和国教育部.科学课程标准[Z].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001..
  • 6袁维新.科学的本质与科学本质教育[J].课程.教材.教法,2004,24(7):68-73. 被引量:65
  • 7Ledennan, N. G., Abd-EI-Khalick, F., Bell, g L, &Schwartz, Pt. (2002) . Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
  • 8Shulman, L S. (1987) Knowledge and teaching:, foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1 - 22.
  • 9IRola Khishfe, Foaud Abd - El - Khalick. (2002) . Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,. 39, 551 -578.
  • 10Abd-EI-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000) . Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665 - 701.

二级参考文献18

  • 1.中国大百科全书·教育[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1985.525.
  • 2.中国大百科全书·哲学(Ⅱ)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1987.1169.
  • 3汤川秀树.创造力和直觉[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1997.54.
  • 4萨顿.科学的生命—文明史论集[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987..
  • 5L W Trowbridge, R J Bybee, J C Powell. Teaching Secondary School Science [M]. 7thed. Columbus,Ohio: Preentice-Hall Inc. 1996. 207.
  • 6National Research Council. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards [M]. Washington,D C: National Academy Press, 2000. 34--35.
  • 7Collette A T, Chiappetta E C. Science Instruction in the Middle and Science School [M]. Columbas U S A: Merrill, 1994. 27-47.
  • 8Suchin K. Effect of Research Experience on Teachers'Perceptions of the Nature Science (Science Training) [M]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota. 1993.
  • 9Abimbola I O. The Relevance of the "New" Philosophy of Science for the Science Curriculum [J].School Science and Mathematics 1983, (3): 181-192.
  • 10Bruner J S. The Process of Education [M]. NewYork: Vintage, 1960. 31.

共引文献65

同被引文献40

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部