期刊文献+

团队领导行为对团队效能影响之研究 被引量:29

Impact of Transformational Leadership on Team Effectiveness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对修订的团队领导行为量表和自编的团队效能量表进行了信效度检验,并在此基础上探讨了团队领导行为对团队效能的影响情况。结果表明修订的中文版团队领导行为量表具有良好的结构效度和信度,可分为动机激励、魅力领导、挑战陈规和个别关怀四个维度;团队效能量表同样具有良好的结构效度和信度,可分为任务绩效和周边绩效两个维度。路径分析和多元线性回归分析的结果表明,转换型团队领导行为对周边绩效的影响显著高于对任务绩效的影响;转换型团队领导行为中动机激励、魅力领导和个别关怀这三个维度对团队效能影响显著,而挑战陈规这一维度对团队效能的影响并不显著。 In present research,exploratory factor analysis was used to test construct validity of “the team leadership practices inventory (LPI)” and “the team effectiveness questionnaire”.The impact of team leadership on team effectiveness was investigated.The results showed preliminary evidence of the LPI and the team effectiveness questionnaire.The LPI could be divided into four subscales,i.e.,four dimensions:inspirational motivation,charismatic leadership,challenging the process and individual consideration.The team effectiveness questionnaire could be divided into two subscales,i.e.,two dimensions:task performance and contextual performance.The result of regression analysis showed that there was a cause-effect relation between team’s transformational leadership and its effectiveness.And inspirational motivation,charismatic leadership,individual consideration had positive relations with team effectiveness.But the relation between challenging the process and team effectiveness was not significant.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2005年第2期181-185,共5页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
关键词 团队 团队领导行为 团队效能 转换型领导 team,team leadership behaviors,team effectiveness,transformational leadership
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Howell J M, Avolio B J. Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(6) :891~902
  • 2Bass B M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press,1985:16~20
  • 3Kouzes J M, Posner B Z. The team leadership practices inventory: measuring leadership of teams. San Francisco:An imprint of Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers, 1992
  • 4Carless S A. Assessing the discriminant validity of the Leadership Practices Inventory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2001, 74(2) :233~300
  • 5李超平,时勘.变革型领导与领导有效性之间关系的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):115-117. 被引量:83
  • 6Den Hartog D N, Van Muijen J J,Koopman P L. Transactional versus transformational leadership: an analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,1997,70(1) :19~34
  • 7Kirkpatrick S V,Locke E A. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership componentson performance and attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996,81(1): 36~49
  • 8Yukl G. An evaluation of conceptual weakness in transformational and charismatic leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 1999,10(2): 285~305
  • 9孟慧.变革型领导风格的实证研究[J].应用心理学,2004,10(2):18-22. 被引量:43

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]Bass, B. M. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expecta- .tions. New York: Free Press, 1985
  • 2[2]Avolio. B. J.,Bass B M.. Jung, D. 1. Re- Examining the Components of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, t999,72: 441- 462
  • 3[3]Tejeda, M. J. , Scandura, T. A., Pillai. R. The MLQ Revisited: Psychometric Properties and Recommendations. Leadership Quarterly,2001,12:31 - 52
  • 4[4]Den Hartog, D. N. , Van Muijen, J. J. , Koopman, P. L..Transactional Versus Transformational Leadership:An Analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1997,70:19 - 34
  • 5[5]Lowe, K. B. , Kroeck, K. G. , Sivasubramaniam, N. Effectiveness of Correlates of Transformational and Transactional Leadership:A Meta- Analytic Review of the MLQ Literatu re. Leadership Quarterly, 1996,7: 385 - 425
  • 6[6]Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. J. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1996
  • 7[7]Arbuckle, J. L. , Wothke, W. Amos 4.0 User' s Guide.Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation, 1999
  • 8[8]Kishton,J. M., Widaman, K. F. Unidimensional Versus Domain Representative Parceling of Questionnaire Items: An Empirical Example. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1994,54: 757 - 765
  • 9[9]Bollen, K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York: Wiley, 1989
  • 10[10]Joreskog, K. G. , Sorbom, D. Lisrel 8: User' s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993

共引文献105

同被引文献354

引证文献29

二级引证文献294

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部