摘要
设Bel_1,Bel_2,Bel_3是有限论域上的三个信任测度,它们的基本概率分布各为m_1,m_2m_3。Dempster给出了两个信任测度的合成规则。张连文、汪培庄等把Dempster合成规则改进为证据的λ-合成规则。还认为λ-合成规则满足结合律,但是没有证明。本文证明了在一般情况下,无论是Dempster的合成规则,或是λ-合成规则,或是改进了的λ-合成规则都不满足结合律。
Let Bel_1,Bel_2,Bel_3,be three belief measures on the finite domain of discourse.Their basicprobatility assignments are m_1,respectively.Dempster has given the combinationrule of two belief measures.The λ-combination rule as the improvement on Dempster’s rule has been given by Zhang Lianwen and Wang Peizhuang.Without proving,it has been reportedin their paper that the λ-combination rule satiafies the associative law.In this paper acounterexample is shown that in general the λ-combination rule does not satisfy the associative law.
出处
《暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版)》
CAS
CSCD
1994年第1期13-18,共6页
Journal of Jinan University(Natural Science & Medicine Edition)
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目
关键词
证据合成
信任测度
结合律
combination of evidence
belief measure
basic probability assignment