期刊文献+

《宋史》论赞评析 被引量:3

Analysis of Lunzan in History of Song
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “论赞”是中国古代的一种史论形式。《宋史》论赞是元史臣对宋代历史的一种考察,一种“盖棺论定”,而这种考察和盖棺论定是以统治者获得资政启示和进行教化为主要目的,其着眼点集中在一代成败兴亡的教训、总结典章制度的得失和褒贬历史人物的善恶上。《宋史》论赞以儒家思想,特别是理学思想的价值取向为圭臬,但运用司马迁以“通古今之变”的研究方法把握宋代历史兴衰治乱规律,和继承中国历史编纂的“直书实录”的优良传统,是《宋史》论赞的突出特点。 Lunzan , which is the remark being attached to historical biography, is one kind of Chinese ancient historical comment. Lunzan in History of Song is the review of history of the Song Dynasty by historiographers of the Yuan Dynasty and the final judgement as well. The purpose of review, whose respect concentrates on the lessons of success and failure of a dynasty , summarizing gain and loss of institutions , appraising and disparaging the good and evil of historical figures, is to gain enlightenment and education for the rulers. The Confucian thought, especially the value of idealist philosophy is the criterion of Lunzan in History of Song. Meanwhile, the historiographers grasp the pattern of rise and decline of the Song Dynasty history applying Si Maqian's researching method of communicating the changes in all ages, they also inherited the good tradition of recording history truly and frankly.
作者 李华瑞
出处 《史学集刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第3期48-55,共8页 Collected Papers of History Studies
关键词 宋史 论赞 治乱兴衰 褒贬臧否 善恶得失 History of Song Lunzan rise and decline praise and disparaging the good and evil gain and loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1浦起龙.史通通释[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1978..
  • 2叶瑛.文史通义校注[Z].北京:中华书局,1994..
  • 3永瑢.四库全书总目[Z].北京:中华书局,1965..
  • 4钱大昕.廿二史考异[A].陈文和主编.嘉定钱大昕全集:第三册[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1997..
  • 5李华瑞.也评朱熹论王安石[A]..漆侠先生纪念文集[C].保定:河北大学出版社,2002..
  • 6钱大昕.十驾斋养新录[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,2000..
  • 7张大可.《史记论赞辑释》[M].陕西人民出版社,1986年出版..
  • 8.《宋史》卷十六《神宗纪·赞》、卷一九九《刑法志·序》、卷三二七《王安石传·论》[M].,..
  • 9宋晞.《正史论赞(一至四)》[M].台北中华文化出版事业委员会,1954-1956年..

共引文献115

同被引文献134

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部