期刊文献+

体外驱除瘤胃厌氧真菌对绵羊和山羊细菌、原虫及稻草干物质降解率的影响 被引量:1

EFFECT OF IN VITRO ELIMINATION OF ANAEROBIC RUMEN FUNGI ON BACTERIA AND PROTOZOA POPULATION AND DEGRADATION OF STRAW DRY MATTER IN SHEE PAND GOATS RUMEN
下载PDF
导出
摘要 选择体况良好、体重30kg左右、安装有永久性瘤胃瘘管的内蒙古白绒山羊和内蒙古土种去势绵羊各3只作为供体羊,为体外批次培养提供瘤胃液。比较研究了驱除瘤胃厌氧真菌对绵羊和山羊细菌、原虫及稻草干物质降解率的影响。结果表明:对照组(F0组)绵羊瘤胃液中真菌游动孢子数量多于对照组山羊瘤胃液;且在培养的2、4、6、48、72小时差异显著(P<0.05)。在培养初期(0~12小时)山羊F0组和F2组(驱真菌组)细菌总数均高于绵羊;绵羊和山羊驱真菌组(F2组)细菌总数均高于对照组(F0组)。山羊F0组(对照组)原虫数量各时间点的平均数显著高于绵羊F0组(P<0.05)。驱除厌氧真菌后绵羊和山羊对稻草干物质降解率显著下降,分别下降了12.06%和8.62%。这说明瘤胃厌氧真菌在纤维物质降解过程中的确发挥了重要作用。 Three male local sheep and three male Inner Mongolia cashmere goats,age d between 1.5 to 2 years and weighing 25.0 to 32.0kg,with a permanent cannula in the rumen were used to suppley rumen fluid in the study on the effect of in vit ro elimination of anaerobic fungi on bacteria and protozoa population and degrad ation of straw dry matter in the rumen.The results showed the enumeration of fun gi zoospores in rumen liquid phase was much more in sheep than in goats,however, the population of bacteria and protozoa in goats was apparent higher than in she ep.The digestibility of straw dry matter did not differ significantly between th e two species,but was higher in sheep(55.40%)than in goats(53.25%).The results a lso indicated the quantity of bacteria was increased significantly after elimina tion of anaerobic fungi,however,the digestibility of straw dry matter was signif icantly decreased(12.06% and 8.62% for sheep and goats respectively).The results suggested that the rumen anaerobic fungi played a vital important role in the d egradation of dietary fibre.
出处 《动物营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期43-48,共6页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
基金 内蒙古科技厅科技攻关项目(20020607)资助。
关键词 真菌 绵羊 山羊 细菌 原虫 fungi sheep goats bacteria protozoa
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1毛胜勇 朱伟云.[D].南京农业大学,2000,P18—21.
  • 2朱伟云,姚文,BWilliams,ADLAkkermans,STamminga,韩正康.动物饲料与胃肠道微生物区系:胃肠道微生物区系的营养生态学[J].动物营养学报,1999,11(S1):33-36. 被引量:8
  • 3Akin D E,Bomeman W S.1990.Role of rumen fungi in fibre degradation[J].J Dairy Sci.,73:3023-3032.
  • 4Hillaire M C,Jouany J P, Fonty G. 1990.Wheat straw degradation,in rusitec,in the presence and absence of rumen anaerobic fungi [J].Proceedings of the Nutrition Society,49:127A.
  • 5Ho Y W,Abdulan N.1999.The role of rumen fungi in fibre digestion [J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science,1:104-112.
  • 6Joblin K N,Naylor G.1989.Fermentation of woods by rumen anaerobic fungi [J].Fems Microbiology Letters,65:119-122.
  • 7Richardson A J,Stewart C S,Campbell G P,et al.1986 Influence of co-culture with rumen bacteria on the ligno-cellulolytic activity of phycomycetous fungi from the rumen[J].Abstract of XIV International Congress of Microbiolog,233:2-24.

共引文献7

同被引文献19

  • 1冯宗慈,高民.通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进[J].内蒙古畜牧科学,1993(4):40-41. 被引量:417
  • 2毛胜勇,陈洁,姚文,朱伟云.体外共培养法研究瘤胃真菌对瘤胃细菌发酵的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2005,24(6):610-613. 被引量:4
  • 3秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,1982,(3):110-115.
  • 4孙云章,毛胜勇,姚文,朱伟云.瘤胃厌氧真菌和细菌对木质素含量不同底物的发酵特性[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2007,36(4):392-395. 被引量:9
  • 5Onodera R, ltabashi H, Ushida K, et al. Rumen microbes and digestive physiology in ruminants [ M ]. Tokyo : Japan Scientific Socieies Press,1997.
  • 6Denman S E, McSweeney C S. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen [ J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2006,58 : 572-582.
  • 7Joblin K N. Isolation, enumeration, and maintenance of rumen anaerobic fungi in rolltubes [ J ]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1981,42 (6) : 1 119-1 122.
  • 8Dehority B A. Evaluation of subsampling and fixation procedures used for counting rumen protozoa [ J ]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1984,48 ( 1 ) : 182-185.
  • 9Gordon G L R,Phillips M W. Removal of anaerobic fungi from the rumen of sheep by chemical treatment and the effect on feed consumption and in vivo fibre digestion[ J ]. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 1993,17:220-223.
  • 10Dehority B A, Tirabasso P A. Antibiosis between ruminal bacteria and ruminal fungi [ J ]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2000,66 (7) :2 921-2 927.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部