期刊文献+

保罗·德·曼的误读理论或修辞学版本的解构主义 被引量:1

Paul de Man's Theory of Reading and Rhetoric
下载PDF
导出
摘要 德.曼所说的“阅读”也就是惯常所说的“阐释”。他认为,任何阅读都是误读,因为阅读要用语言,而语言总是一种修辞,即说法,从而不可能有惟一的解读,而是有各种不同读法。由此,德.曼提出了他的最有代表性的观点,即任何阅读所获得的洞见同时也是盲点,因为它总是从某种预设出发,从而必然忽略了其它视点。德.曼版本的解构主义最早在美国打开了新的批评空间,在某种意义上也奠定了美国20世纪90年代以降文学批评与文化批判混化的基础。 Paul de Man's understanding of the term 'reading' radically expands the meaning of the term and actually relates it with 'interpretation'. According to de Man, all readings are misreadings because reading involves the use of language and language is always rhetorical. That means that any kind of reading or interpretation is only a perspective among many other possible perspectives. There is not such a thing as the single truth. As such, any kind of reading has two sides, that is , its insight and blindness go hand in hand. The reason for this is that , limited by its own perspective, it is always blind to other perspectives. de Man's theory analyses various mistakes because of this blindness in reading. Through his analysis, he opened new horizons for American criticism.
作者 郭军
出处 《四川外语学院学报》 北大核心 2005年第4期6-9,36,共5页 Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
关键词 保罗·德·曼 阅读 修辞 洞见 盲点 Paul de Man theory of reading and rhetoric insight blindness
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Arac, Jonathan et al ( ed. ). The Yale Critics: Deconstruction in America[ M ]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983. xxiv.
  • 2McQuillan, Martin. Paul de Man[ M]. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.
  • 3J. Miller, Hillis. The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man,Eliot, Trollope, James , and Benjamin[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
  • 4De Man, Paul. Allegory of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust [ M ]. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979.
  • 5De Man, Paul. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism [ M ]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.
  • 6Selden, Raman. A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory[ M]. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo:Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989. 95.
  • 7Beckett, Samuel. Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress [ M ]. Paris:Shakespeare & Company, 1929. 13.
  • 8.德·曼在mistake和error之间是做了区别的,前者是通常所说的错误,后者才是真正的误差[Z].,..

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部