期刊文献+

对西方国际关系理论的哲学思考——兼议中国国际关系理论的构建 被引量:2

Philosophical Reflections on Western International Relation Theories——with Explorative Thoughts on China's IRT Building-up
原文传递
导出
摘要 从本体论、认识论和方法论3个层面对西方国际关系理论主要流派进行梳理和类归,认为国际关系理论与哲学思想有密切关系。西方国际关系理论重视以哲学本体论-认识论-方法论及其所隐含的价值论体系为基本前提和重要基础,在呈现流派繁荣和学科成熟的同时,也存在着诸如科学与伦理、必然与偶然对立割裂等一些哲学意义上的重大缺陷。认为中国国际关系理论的构建需在哲学层面加强基础性探索和研究。在这一过程中,应处理好“古”与“今”、中”与“外”的关系。参照西方国际关系理论谱系有重要借鉴意义,但强调中国的国际关系理论应更具鲜明的实践品质,并尝试提出了“和谐的国际社会”这一具有现实意义的理论概念和命题。 The article conducts a comparative analysis of the main contemporary Western International Relation Theories from the philosophical perspective of ontology, epistemology and methodology, through which the fact is clearly noted that IRTs and philosophical thoughts are more often than not intimately related and that Western IRTs are premised and based on philosophical ontology, epistemology, methodology and the value system reflected therein. Although Western IRTs have achieved diversity in theoretical schools and maturity in academic study, it is evident that there still exist some significant limitations in terms of philosophical basis, for instance, the antinomy of science and ethics, inevitability and contingency. China needs more basic philosophical exploration and study in its IRT building-up, in the course of which, issues pertaining to the relations between PAST and PRESENT, OURS and THEIRS shall be properly handled. In this context, the Western IRTs have its relevance as a point of reference for China's IRT building-up. More importantly, China's IRT building-up shall strive to overcome the limitations of Western IRTs so much so that it is more practice-oriented and that harmonious international society is a valuable theoretical concept and proposition.
作者 张吉明
机构地区 外交部
出处 《外交评论(外交学院学报)》 CSSCI 2005年第3期72-77,共6页 Foreign Affairs Review
关键词 西方国际关系理论 中国国际关系理论 哲学 和谐的国际社会 IRTs in the western countries IRT Building-up in China Philosophy Harmonious International Society
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献44

  • 1Barry Buzan,"The English School: A Bibliography".
  • 2马丁·怀特 秦治来译.“为什么没有国际理论?”[A].詹姆斯·德·代元主编.《国际关系理论批判》[C].浙江人民出版社,2003年.第35、36页.
  • 3赫德利·布尔.“1919—1969年的国际政治理论”[A].詹姆斯·德·代元主编.《国际关系理论批判》[C].,.第198-199,221页.
  • 4Kenneth Waltz, Theory oflnternational Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979, p. 91.
  • 5Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1977, p. 13.
  • 6Martin Wight, Systems of States, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977, pp. 33 - 34.
  • 7R. J. Vincent, Human Rights and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 37 - 56, 47.
  • 8Iver B. Neumann and Ole Waever eds. , The Future oflnternational Relations: Masters in the Making? London: Routledge, 1997, p. 54.
  • 9Herbert Butterfield, Christianity arm History, London : G. Bell, 1949, p. 52.
  • 10Herbert Butterfield,History and Human Relations, London: Collins, 1951 .

共引文献129

同被引文献40

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部