罪刑法定司法化研究

Studies on the Judicature of a Legally Prescribed Punishment for a Specified Crime

在罪刑法定的语境中,司法权具有限制性,从而与具有绝对性司法权的罪刑擅断明确地划清了界限。在罪刑法定原则下,司法主体只有具有了这种自主性,才能严格根据法律规定对行为是否构成犯罪作出正确的判断。法官独立,法官只服从法律而不屈从于权力,是罪刑法定司法化的重要保证。在罪刑法定司法化当中,刑事司法体制的建构当然是至关重要的;但与此同时,司法理念的引领同样是必不可少的。在某种意义上可以说,司法理念是罪刑法定司法化的思想保障,只有在法治的司法理念指导下,罪刑法定司法化才有可能实现。同样,只有发展出一套娴熟的司法解释技术,才能为罪刑法定司法化提供手段保障。

In the context of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, the judicial power is restrictive, thus it clearly distinguishes from tyranny in conviction and sentencing with absolute judicial power. Within the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, where the judicial subject only boasts of self-independence, it may can make a correct judgment towards whether an act constitutes a crime strictly in accordance with the regulations of law. The independence of judge, who just surrenders to law not power, is the significant security of the judicature of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, within which the establishment of criminal judicature system is the most important; simultaneously the direction of judicial reasoning is indispensable. In a sense, judicial reasoning is the ideological security of the foresaid topic. Only under the guidance of judicial reasoning according to legality may the judicature of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime realize. Likewise, only a skillful judicial interpretation develops can it provide instrumental security for the judicature of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime.