销售假冒注册商标的商品行为人主观罪过的认定

Determination of Subjective Transgression against Commodity Dealers' Vendition of Counterfeit Registered Trade Marks

对销售假冒注册商标的商品行为人的主观罪过的认定,是颇有争议的问题。从立法角度考虑,有学者分别以销售者的认知程度和目的论证该罪的主观罪过为间接故意或直接故意;从司法角度看,学者则对“明知”的不同理解,分别得出该罪主观罪过为间接故意与直接故意两种不同结论。文章从立法与司法角度论证了该罪直接故意的合理性,并借鉴严格责任对罪过认定过程中的司法实践与立法冲突提出合理建议。

How to determine the subjective transgression against those commodity dealers' vendition of counterfeit trademarks is a problem frequently disputed. In respect of legislation, some researchers try to prove the subjective transgression to be directly intentional and indirectly intentional respectively from the aspect of the dealers' purpose and cognitive degree. In respect of judicature, owing to the different understanding of 'definite realization', some researchers come to the opposite conclusions that this subjective transgression is directly intentional or indirectly intentional. This paper proves the reasonableness that it is directly intentional, and by strictly verifying the responsibility, puts forward some rational advice on solving the conflict between the practice of judicature and legislation during the process of taking cognizance of the transgression.