期刊文献+

磁共振心脏成像与超声心动图评价左室收缩功能 被引量:8

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on evaluation of left ventricular systolic function: compared with echocardiography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价磁共振心脏成像(CMRI)与超声心动图对左室收缩功能的诊断价值。方法对75例临床怀疑心脏疾病的患者进行心脏MRI与超声心动图检查,测量左室射血分数(LVEF),其中27例结果与左室造影相对照。结果75例心脏MRI所测EF值(%)=42.31±19.70,超声心动图所测EF值(%)=48.79±17.10;27例行左室造影病例中,心脏MRI所测EF值(%)=35.64±13.36,超声心动图所测EF值(%)=39.95±12.72,左室造影所测EF值(%)=36.65±14.27。对同一病例,心脏MRI所测EF值较超声心动图偏低(-6.48±12.34,t=-4.544,P<0.001)。27例患者心脏MRI与超声心动图结果均与左室造影结果无统计学差异心脏MRI(r=0.839,P<0.001),超声心动图(r=0.761,P<0.001)。结论对左室收缩功能的评价,心脏MRI与超声心动图均具重要的临床应用价值(r=0.784,P<0.001),心脏MRI一般比超声心动图所测LVEF数值偏小,差值≤10%。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) and echocardiography on left ventricular systolic function. Methods CMRI and echocardiography examinations were performed on 75 patients suspected with heart disease, and 27 patients underwent left ventricular angiogram. LVEF of each exam was measured and compared. Results In 75 cases, LVEF of CMRI (%) was 42.31±19.70, LVEF of echocardiography (%) was 48.79±17.10, while in 27 cases with left ventricular angiogram, LVEF of CMRI (%) was 35.64±13.36, LVEF of echocardiography (%) was 39.95±12.72, LVEF of left ventricular angiogram (%) was 36.65±14.27, respectively. LVEF of CMRI was lower than that of echocardiography in the same cases (-6.48±12.34,t=-4.544). LVEF of both CMRI (r=0.839, P<0.001) and echocardiography (r=0.761, P<0.001) was correlated to that of left ventricular angiogram. Conclusion Both CMRI and echocardiography are of great diagnostic value in evaluating cardiac systolic function. LVEF of CMRI is lower than that of echocardiography, and the difference is usually within 10%.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第7期1033-1035,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 每搏输出量 磁共振成像 超声心动描记术 Stroke volume Magnetic resonance imaging Echocardiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1李永忠.磁共振成像评价冠状动脉硬化性心脏病的进展[J].国外医学(临床放射学分册),2002,25(6):341-347. 被引量:3
  • 2Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Gourd RG. Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging[J].Radiology,1987,163(3):697-702.
  • 3Bogaert JG, Bosmans HT, Rademakers FE, et al. Left ventricular quantification with breath-hold MR imaging: comparison with echocardiography[J].MAGMA,1995,3(1):5-12.
  • 4Anand IS, Florea VG, Solomon SD, et al. Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular remodeling: concepts, techniques, and implication for clinical trials[J].J Card Fail,2002,8(6 Suppl):452-464.
  • 5Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ, et al. Importance of imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two-and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging[J].Am Coll Cardiol,2002,35(2):477-484.
  • 6Mahnken AH, Spuntrup E, Wildberger JE, et al. Quantification of cardiac function with multiple spiral CT using retrospective ECG-gating: comparison with MRI[J].Rofo,2003,175(1):83-88.
  • 7Ioannidis JP.Trikalinos TA, Danias PG. Electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,39(12):2059-2068.
  • 8李坤成,刘汉英.中国人心脏磁共振成像正常所见及测量研究[J].中国循环杂志,1991,6(1):24-27. 被引量:11
  • 9Lee VS, Resnick D, Bundy JM, et al. Cardiac function: MR evaluation in one breath hold with real time true fast imaging with steady-state precession[J].Radiology,2002,222(3):835-842.
  • 10Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, et al. Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume difference and reproducibility[J].Radiology,2002,223(3):789-797.

二级参考文献42

  • 1Reeder SB, Faranesh AZ, Boxerman JL, et al. In vivo measurement of T2* and field in homogeneity maps in the human heart at 1.5T. Magn Reson Med, 1998, 39(6): 988-998
  • 2Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH, et al. High-speed sipral-scan echo planar NMR imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1986, 5(1): 2-7
  • 3Atalay MK, Forder JR, Chaeko VP, et al. Oxygenation in the rabbit myoeardium: assessment with susceptibility-dependent MR imaging. Radiology, 1993, 189(3): 759-764
  • 4Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, et al. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med, 1995, 34(4): 555-566
  • 5Schipke JD, Korbmacher B, Schwanke U, et al. Basal metabolism does not account for high O2 consumption in stunned myocardium. Am J Physiol, 1998, 274(3Pt2): H743-H746
  • 6Kim HW, Scott KN, t3runer, AP, et al. Cardiac 31P MRS identifies ischemia in twenty percent of women with chest pain but no significant angiographic stosis. Proceedings of the international society for magnetic resonance in medicine, 2001: 916
  • 7Li D, Zheng J, Bae KT, et al. Conrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the oronary arteries. Invest Radiol, 1998, 33 (9): 578-586
  • 8Zerhouni EA, Parish DM, Rogers WJ, et al. Human heart: tagging with MR imaging-a method for noninvasive assessment of myocardial motion. Radiology, 1988, 169(1): 59-63
  • 9Baer FM, Theissen P, Crnae J, et al. Head to head comparison of dobutamine-transoesophageal echocardiography and dobutamine-magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of left ventricular functional recovery in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J, 2000,21(12): 981-991
  • 10Nilsson JC, Nielsen G, Groenning BA, et al. Sustained post infarction myocardial oedema in humans visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart, 2001,85(6): 639-642

共引文献32

同被引文献54

引证文献8

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部