期刊文献+

亚宁定与酚妥拉明治疗高血压急症的降压疗效比较 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较亚宁定和酚妥拉明对高血压急症的疗效。方法高血压急症患者62例,随机分为A、B两组,A组用亚宁定12.5mg静注再予100—400ug/min静滴维持;B组用酚妥拉明5mg静注再予0.1—2mg/min静滴维持。结果亚宁定用药后5分钟内即出现明显降压效果(P<0.05),20—30分钟达降压高峰,此后的降压效果相对平稳,心率无显著变化(P<0.05),酚妥拉明组降压高峰在30~60分钟,治疗后心率比治疗前增快。结论亚宁定用于治疗高血压急症时疗效与酚妥拉明相当,但起效迅速,降压平稳,用药前后心率无明显变化,副作用较轻。
作者 刘甲兴 芮磊
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2005年第8期69-70,共2页 Hainan Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献25

同被引文献21

  • 1杨晓晖,张力,吴桂芝,刘翠丽,杨乐.消渴丸的不良反应与合理应用[J].中国药物警戒,2006,3(2):76-80. 被引量:11
  • 2陆德澄,侯建民,汤永祥,芮涛,慈书平,陈志梅.静脉注射卡托普利和酚妥拉明治疗重症高血压病的比较[J].新药与临床,1996,15(6):328-330. 被引量:5
  • 3WHO. The selection of essential drugs : report of a WHO expert committee (WHO Technical Report Series 615) [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1977 : 28~33.
  • 4WHO. The use of essential drugs : second report of the WHO expert committee (WHO Technical Report Series 722) [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1985:7~8.
  • 5WHO. The use of essential drugs :ninth report of the WHO expert committee (WHO Technical Report Series 895) [M]. Geneva. World Health Organization, 2000 : 4~ 5.
  • 6WHO. The selection and use of essential drugs, report of the WHO expert committee ( WHO Technical Report Series 914) [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002 : 5 ~ 7.
  • 7Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [EB/OL]. www. cochrane-handbook.org. 2010-03-20.
  • 8Faunce TA. Toward a treaty on safety and cost(effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: enhancing an endangered global public good[J]. Globalization and Health, 2006, 2 : 5.
  • 9Berger ML, Teutsch S. Cost-effectiveness analysis: from science to application[J]. Medical Care, 2005, 43 (7 suppl) : 49.
  • 10International society for pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research. Pharmacoeconomie Guidelines Around the World [EB/OL]. http: //www.ispor.org/peguidelines/index. asp. 2010-03-20.

引证文献1

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部