基于工作嵌入核心员工组织绩效——自愿离职研究模型的拓展与检验被引量：97

导出

摘要本文根据组织网络嵌入性理论,借鉴Allen(2001)的雇员工作绩效—自愿离职二路径中介链模型,引入工作嵌入概念拓展为一个基于现代组织社会资本嵌入视角的核心员工组织绩效—自愿离职五路径中介链模型,并在一类知识密集型行业组织——卫生保健单位的样本中获得显著性验证结果:(1)员工组织绩效与自愿离职的关系是一个具有两重性(保持性和流失性)多路径和多激励环节的关系系统;(2)在这类关系效应系统中,工作嵌入的中介地位极为突出,对核心员工自愿离职具有占优制约性;(3)对模型调节变量交互效应假设检验的显著性发现,与个人社会网络相关联的工作外报酬和家庭责任可以是重要的制约员工离职的保持性因素;(4)引入工作嵌入有利于识别和拓展人才保持的关键管理领域,培育基于组织智力资本的核心竞争力。

作者梁小威廖建桥曾庆海

机构地区华中科技大学管理学院武汉市卫生局

出处《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第7期106-115,共10页 Journal of Management World

分类号 C936 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Allen, D. G. & Rodger W. Griffeth,1999,"Job Performance and Turnover: A Review and Integrative Multi-route Model",Human Resources Management Review, 9 (4): pp.525-548.
2Allen, D. G. & Rodger W. Griffeth ,2001, "Test of A Mediating Performance-turnover Relationship Highlighting the Moderating Roles of Visibility and Reward Contingency" ,Journal of Applied Psycholoev, 86(5): pp.1014-1021.
3Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J.,1993, " Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance",In N. Schmitt, & W. Borman(Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations ,pp.71-98. New York: Jossev-Bass.
4Dahon, R. D., William D. T., & David M. K.,1982,"Turnover Overstated: the Functional Taxonomy",Academy of Management Review , Vol.7, No.1: pp.117-123.
5Dess , Gregory G., & Jason D. Shaw,2001, "Voluntary Turnover, Social Capital and Organizational Performance",Academy of Management Review, 26: pp.446-456.
6Granovetter, M.,1992, "Problem of Explanation in Economic Sociology,in Networks and Organizations",Edited by Nitin Nohria and Robert G.Ecles,Harvard Business School Press,pp.1-26.
7Griffeth R. W. &Hom P. W., 1995, "The employee turnover process",Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13: pp.245-293.
8Hulin, C. M., Roznowski, M. & Hachiya, D., 1985, "Alternative Opportunities and Withdrawal Decisions: Empirical and Theoretical Discrepancies and An Integration",Psychological Bulletin,97:pp.233-250.
9Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A.,& Bolger, N.,1998,"Data analysis in social psychology", The Handbook of Social Psychology, 1: pp.233-268.
10Lance, C. E., 1988, "Job Performance as A Moderator of the Satisfaction-turnover Intention Relation: An Empirical Contrast of two Perspectives", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9:pp.271-280.

二级参考文献25

1Griffeth R. W., Hom P. W. ,Gaertmer K A.. Meta-analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover :Update ,Moderator Tests ,and Research Implications for the Next Millennium[J]. Journal of Management,2000,26(3): 463-488.
2Lee T. W. , Hohon B. C. , McDaniel L. S. , and Hill J. W.. The Unfolding Model of Voluntary Tumover:a Replication and Extension[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999,42(4) : 450- 462.
3Mitehell T. R. , Holtom B C. , Lee T. W. , Sablynski C.J. , Erez M.. Why People Stay : Using Job Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover[J]. Academy of Management Journal , 2001,44:1102-1121.
4Hom P. W. ,Kinicki A. J.. Towards a Greater Understanding of How Dissatisfactions Drives Employee Turnover [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44 (5):975- 987.
5Price J. L. Reflections on the Determinants of Voluntary Turnover[J]. Journal of Manpower, 2001,22:600-624.
6Allen D. G. , and Griffeth R. W.. Test of a Mediated Performance-Turnover Relationship Highlighting the Moderating Roles of Visibility and Reward Cotlngency[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001,86:1014-1021.
7Gaerther S.. Structural Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Turnover Models[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 1999,9 (4) : 479-493.
8Nahapiet,J.and Ghoshal,S.Social capital,intellectual capital,an, d the organizational advantage.The Academy of Management Review[J].1998,Vol,23(2):242-266.
9Leana,C.R.and Van Buren Ⅲ,H.J.Organizational social capital and employment practices[J].Academy of Management Review. 1999,Vol.24:538-555.
10Dess,Gregory G,& Jason D.Shaw. Voluntary Turnover,Social Capital and Organizational Performance[J].Academy of Management Review,2001,26:446-456.