期刊文献+

A New Retrieval Model Based on TextTiling for Document Similarity Search 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 Document similarity search is to find documents similar to a given query document and return a ranked list of similar documents to users, which is widely used in many text and web systems, such as digital library, search engine,etc. Traditional retrieval models, including the Okapi's BM25 model and the Smart's vector space model with length normalization, could handle this problem to some extent by taking the query document as a long query. In practice,the Cosine measure is considered as the best model for document similarity search because of its good ability to measure similarity between two documents. In this paper, the quantitative performances of the above models are compared using experiments. Because the Cosine measure is not able to reflect the structural similarity between documents, a new retrieval model based on TextTiling is proposed in the paper. The proposed model takes into account the subtopic structures of documents. It first splits the documents into text segments with TextTiling and calculates the similarities for different pairs of text segments in the documents. Lastly the overall similarity between the documents is returned by combining the similarities of different pairs of text segments with optimal matching method. Experiments are performed and results show:1) the popular retrieval models (the Okapi's BM25 model and the Smart's vector space model with length normalization)do not perform well for document similarity search; 2) the proposed model based on TextTiling is effective and outperforms other models, including the Cosine measure; 3) the methods for the three components in the proposed model are validated to be appropriately employed.
出处 《Journal of Computer Science & Technology》 SCIE EI CSCD 2005年第4期552-558,共7页 计算机科学技术学报(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Robertson S, Walker S. Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In Proc. the 17th International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR'2003), Dublin, Ireland, 1994, pp.232-241.
  • 2Salton G. The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice-Hall, 1971.
  • 3Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press and Addison Wesley, New York, 1999.
  • 4Jones W P, Furnas G W. Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1987, 38(6): 420-442.
  • 5Zobel J, Moffat A. Exploring the similarity space. ACM SIGIR FORUM, 1998, 32(1): 18-34.
  • 6Aslam J A, Frost M. An information-theoretic measure for document similarity. In Proc. the 26th International ACM/SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'2003), Toronto, Canada, 2003,pp.449-450.
  • 7Hammouda K M, Kamel M S. Document similarity using a phrase indexing graph model. Journal of Knowledge and Information Systems, 2004, 6(6): 710-717.
  • 8I .Hearst M A. Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text.In Proc. the 32nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'1994), Los Cruces, NM, 1994, pp.9-16.
  • 9van Rijsbergen C J. Information Retrieval. Butterworths,London, 1979.
  • 10Deerwester S C, Dumais S T, Landauer T K et al. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Societyof Information Science, 1990, 41(6): 211-240.

同被引文献14

  • 1Becker J,Kuropka D.Topic-based Vector Space Model[C]// Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Business Information System.Colorado,USA:Springs,2003:7-12.
  • 2Blei D M,Ng A Y,Jordan M I.Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003,3(5):993-1022.
  • 3Griffiths T L,Steyvers M.Finding Scientific Topics[J].Journal of the National Academy of Science,2004,101(Suppl.1):5228-5235.
  • 4Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern information retrieval [ M]. New York : ACM, 1999 : 1-180.
  • 5Becker J,Kuropka D. Topic-based vector space model [C]// Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Business Information System. Colorado Springs:[ s. n. ] ,2003 : 7-12.
  • 6Hearst M A. Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text [ C] //Proceedings of the 32nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. New Mexico : ACL, 1994:9-16.
  • 7Lovasz L,Plummer M D. Matching theory [ M ]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1986 : 1-200.
  • 8Papadimitriou C H, Raghavan P, Tamaki H, et al. Latent semantic indexing: a probabilistic analysis [ C ]//Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Principles of Database Systems. Washington : ACM, 1998 : 159-168.
  • 9Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent dirichlet allocation [ J ]. Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003,3:993- 1022.
  • 10Hofmann T. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis [ C ]// Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Stockholm : Morgan Kaufmann, 1999 : 289-296.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部