期刊文献+

非对称互联网骨干网网间互联激励分析 被引量:1

Incentive Analysis of Asymmetric Internet Network Interconnection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了促进互联网的发展和制定出合理的互联政策,分析了非对称互联网骨干网对互联互通的偏好。骨干网网间互联互通质量的好坏决定着互联网业务的质量,而解决互联互通质量的关键在于正确了解不同企业对互联的评价。互联网与电信网最大的不同是其主要通信为网站与人的通信,从而内容提供商的多少能够代表骨干网企业的不同程度。针对互联网的特点,采用两阶段博弈模型分析对拥有不同内容提供商基数的骨干网企业的互联激励。通过对互联互通质量差异效应和需求扩大效应分析,可以看出,不同互联网骨干网企业具有不同的互联偏好,基数小的网络偏好完全互联,而基数大的互联网骨干网企业随着两网基数差异不同而对互联有不同的偏好。最后利用模型得出的结论对我国骨干网企业互联现象进行了说明。 The interconnection preference of asymmetric IBPs (Internet Backbone Providers) was studied to promote internet development and make reasonable interconnection policy. Interconnection quality determined the quality of Internet services and the key to solve interconnection difficulty grasped interconnection valuation of the providers. Since the difference between internet and telecom was that the former is the main communication between websites and person, the amount of ICP may represent difference between IBPs to a great extent. Based on the characteristics of Internet, the two-stage game model analyzed the interconnection incentives for two networks that differ with respect to the size of their installed bases of ICPs (Internet Content Providers).Through the analysis of quality differentiation effect and demand expansion effect of interconnection, the smaller provider prefers perfect interconnection quality, while the provider has the different preferences of interconnection quality according to the difference between installed bases. Finally, theory derived from the model analyzes interconnection phenomena between IBPs in China.
作者 王琦 吕廷杰
出处 《吉林大学学报(信息科学版)》 CAS 2005年第4期362-367,共6页 Journal of Jilin University(Information Science Edition)
关键词 互联网互联互通 质量差异效应 需求扩大效应 网络外部性 <Keyword>internet interconnection quality differentiation effect demand expansion effect network externalities
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1LAFFONT J J, MARCUS S, REY P, TIROLE J. Internet Peering [J]. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 2001, 91 (10): 287-291.
  • 2JULIAN WRIGHT. Pricing Access to Internet Service Providers [J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2004, 106 (2):256-261.
  • 3HANK INTVEN, JEREMY OLIVER, EDGARDO SEPULVEDA. Telecommunication Regulations Handbook [M]. Beijing:Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Press, 2001.
  • 4LEONARD KLEINROCK. The Internet Rules of Engagement: Then and Now [J]. Technology in Society, 2004, 26 (7):193-207.
  • 5KENDE M. The Digital Handshake: Connecting Internet Backbones [A]. OPP WP 32 Federal Communications Commission[C]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000: 84-89.
  • 6AMIT GAYER, OZ SHY. Internet and Peer-to-Peer Distributions in Markets for Digital Products [J]. Economics Letters,2003, 81 (14): 197-203.
  • 7CREMER J, REY P, TIROLE J. Connectivity in the Commercial Internet [J]. Journal of Industrial Economics XLVIII,2000, 71 (10): 433-472.
  • 8KATZ M, SHAPIRO C. Network Externalities, Competition. and Compatibility [J]. American Economic Review, 1985,75 (5): 424-440.
  • 9OSTEIN FOROS, HANS JARLE KIND, JAN YNGVE SAND. Do Internet Incumbents Choose Low Intereonnection Quality?[J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2004, 15 (2): 133-140.
  • 10王军,赵英才.电信网络运营经济效益的分析与评价思路[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2004,22(1):40-44. 被引量:7

二级参考文献3

共引文献6

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部