期刊文献+

3种浓度罗哌卡因用于肌间沟臂丛阻滞麻醉的临床观察 被引量:7

Clinical observation on the intersclance brachial plexus block anesthesia with three concentrations of ropicaine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的借助神经刺激器定位肌间沟臂丛阻滞,观察3种浓度罗哌卡因的阻滞效果和不良反应,为临床寻找一种合适浓度配方。方法选择行上肢手术的成人患者60例,随机分为3组,每组20例。A、B、C3组分别采用0·25%、0.375%和0.5%3种浓度罗哌卡因各30ml。采用神经刺激器定位肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞麻醉。观察感觉神经阻滞时间、运动阻滞时间及阻滞程度、镇痛持续时间、不良反应。结果与A组比较,B组和C组感觉神经阻滞时间延长差异有显著性(P<0.05),C组运动阻滞时间延长和镇痛持续时间差异有显著性(P<0.05),B组和C组运动阻滞程度明显增强(P<0.01)。A组有3例术中有疼痛不适,需要用杜冷丁镇痛,B组发生1例霍纳氏综合征,C组发生3例霍纳氏综合征和2例呼吸困难,经面罩吸氧1h后缓解。未发生其它并发症。结论借助神经刺激器定位肌间沟臂丛阻滞,3种浓度罗哌卡因均可满足手术的要求,但0.375%罗哌卡因更适合于肌间沟臂丛阻滞麻醉。 Objective To observe the properties of three concentration of ropivacaine to find a best concentration of ropivacaine suitable for interscalence brachial plexus block with nerves stimulator. Methods Sixty adult patients undergoing upper limb surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups (each consisted of 20 patients):group A and B and C separately receiving 0.25%,0.375%,0.5%ropivacaine 30 ml in interscalence brachial plexus block with nerves stimulator. The onset time of sensory and motor block ,the degree of motor block ,analgesia maintenance time were recorded. Results The onset time of sensory block was significantly longer in group B and C(P<0.05);the onset time of motor block and analgesia maintenance time in group C was significantly longer (P< 0.05),the degree of motor block was significantly increased in group B and C (P< 0.01). Conclusion 0.375%ropicaine is more suitable for interscalence brachial plexus.
机构地区 海南省人民医院
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2005年第5期1026-1027,共2页 China Tropical Medicine
基金 海南省卫生厅重点科研项目资助(琼卫2002-01)
关键词 神经刺激器 肌间沟臂丛 罗哌卡因 Nerves stimulator Brachial plexus Ropivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1Tulchinsky A, Weller RS, Rosenblum M, et al. Nerve stimulator polarity and brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg, 1993,77 ( 1 ) : 100-103.
  • 2Pdegler FX. Brachial plexus block with the nerve stimulator: motor response characteristics at three sites. Reg Anesth, 1992,17(5) :295-299.
  • 3Franco CD, Vieira ZE. 1,001 subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blocks: success with a nerve stimulator. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2000,25(1):41-46.
  • 4Eifert B, Hahnel J, Kusterman J. AxiUary blockade of the brachial plexus. Aprospective study of blockade success using electric nerve stimulator. Anaesthesist, 1994,43(12) :780-785.
  • 5Kobayashi M, Takeyodai S, Takiyanm R, et al. A report on 107 cases of obturator nerve block. Masui, 1991,40(7) : 1138-1143.
  • 6Naja Z, el I-lassma MJ, Khatib H, et al. Combined sciatic-paravertebral nerve block vs. general anaesthesia for fractured hip of the elderly. Middle East J Anesthesiol,2000,15(5) :559-568.
  • 7Di Benedetto P, Borghi B, Ricci A, et al. Loco-regional anaesthesia of the lower limbs. Minerva Anestesiol, 2001,67 (9 Suppl 1 ) : 56-64.
  • 8Provenmno DA, Viscusi ER, Adams SB Jr, et al. Safety and efficacy of the popliteal fossa nerve block when utilized for foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int,2002,23(5):394-399.
  • 9Shannon J, tang SA, Yip RW, et al. Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block revisited. A nerve stimulator technique. Reg Anesth, 1995,20(2):100-104.
  • 10Konrad C, Johr M. Blockade of the sciatic nerve in the pophteal fossa: a system for standardization in children. Anesth Analg, 1998, 87(6) : 1256-1258.

共引文献96

同被引文献35

引证文献7

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部