期刊文献+

体外冲击波碎石治疗肾盏结石的疗效观察 被引量:2

Observation on the effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotrity on renal calyceal stone.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨治疗肾盏结石的有效微创治疗方法。方法对2004年应用B超定位体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)治疗的肾盏结石192例(肾上盏35例,肾中盏50例,肾下盏107例)进行回顾性分析。结果肾上盏结石排净率85.71%,肾中盏结石86%,肾下盏结石73.83%。结论ESWL仍应作为肾盏结石治疗的首选方法,但如果结石位置近肾实质处应优先选择经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)或软性输尿管肾镜碎石术。 Objective To explore the effective microinjury method for treatment of renal calyceal stones. Methods 192 patients with renal calyceal stones (35 with upper calyceal stones, 50 with middle calyceal stones ,and 107 with lower calyceal stones) treated by ESWL with B-Ultrasound orientation in 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The stone free rates of upper, middle and lower calyceal stones were 85.71%, 86% and 73.83% respectively. Conclusion ESWL is the first choice for treatment of renal calyceal stones, but the PCNL or Ureteropyeloscopy lithotripsy is recommended if the position of renal calyceal stone is close to cortical substance.
作者 李建明
机构地区 高州市人民医院
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2005年第5期1060-1061,共2页 China Tropical Medicine
关键词 体外冲击波碎石术 肾结石 肾盏 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotrity Renal calculi Kidney calices
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1[1]Cass A S, Grine W B, Jenkins J M, et al. The incidence of lower-pole nephrolithiasis-increasing or not? Br J Urol, 1998, 82: 12-15.
  • 2[2]Albala D M, Assimos D G, Clayman R V,et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol, 2001, 166: 2072-2080.
  • 3[3]Elbahnasy A M, Shalhav A L, Hoenig D M, et al. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.J Urol, 1998, 159:676-682.
  • 4[4]Gupta N P, Singh D V, Hemal A K, et al. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2000, 163: 24-27.
  • 5[5]Keeley F X, Moussa S A, Smith G, et al. Clearance of lower pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the in-fundibulopelvic angle. Eur Urol, 1999, 36: 371-375.
  • 6[6]Madbouly K, Sheir K Z, Elsobky E. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol, 2001, 165: 1415-1418.
  • 7[7]Honey D A, Luymes R G, Weir M J, et al. Mechanical percussion inversion can result in relocation of lower pole stone fragments after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology, 2000, 55: 204-206.
  • 8[8]Grasso M, Ficazzola M. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. J Urol, 1999, 162: 1904-1908.
  • 9[9]Hollenbeck B K, Schuster T G, Faerber G J, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with in situ lithotripsy for lower pole calculi. Urology, 2001, 58: 859-863.
  • 10[10]Kumar P V S, Joshi H B, Keeley F X. An acute infundibulopelvic angle: a contraindication to flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole stones. J Endourol, 1999, 13(Suppl): 43A-43A.

共引文献61

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部