摘要
法律思维是一种职业思维方式,它不能违背一般逻辑思维规律。法律思维是一种运用形式逻辑规则的反省性思维。人们可以运用形式逻辑规则反思关于法律问题的种种判断。这实际上是从逻辑学的角度论证了法律思维的可能性。本文主要是通过比较霍姆斯法官“反逻辑”的思维模式,评价了狄亚瑟法官的法律思维,强调了法律思维的基本工具是形式逻辑的规则。
As a kind of professional mode of thinking, legal thinking is a reflective thinking using rules of formal logic and should not contravene the general rules of logic thinking. People can reconsider various judgments of legal issues by using rules of formal logic. In fact, this proves that legal logic is possible in logic. By comparing Judge Holmes' anti- logic mode of thinking and Judge Aldisert's legal thinking, the paper highlights that the fundamental tools for legal thinking are rules of formal logic.
出处
《北京行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第4期47-51,共5页
Journal of Beijing administration institute