摘要
本文在成本不对称的假设下,利用 Bertrand 双寡头模型研究了追求利润最大化的企业遭受出口反倾销时在出口与对外直接投资之间的战略选择。文章首先分析了在进口国政府不同的反倾销措施情况下,出口国企业与生产相似产品的进口国企业之间的 Bertrand 价格竞争;其次分析了不同类型成本优势对出口企业战略选择的影响;文章最后得出结论:跨越反倾销的对外直接投资要求出口国企业的成本优势至少是部分可以转移的,并且对外直接投资的固定成本必须小于征收反倾销税情况下的主要固定费用;如果成本优势完全不可转移,或者对外直接投资的固定成本太高,则无论进口国政府采取何种反倾销措施,出口国企业都不会选择对外直接投资。
Assuming cost asymmetry,this paper employed Bertrand duopoly model and analyzed the strategic choice of the profit-maximizing firm between exports and outward FDI in the face of exports anti-dumping.Firstly,in the case of different anti- dumping measures of import country,this paper analyzed that the export firm was engaged in Bertrand price competition with the import firm of the“like product”in import country.Secondly,this paper explored the effect of different types of cost advantage on the strategic choice of the export firm.Finally,this paper concluded that the requirement of anti-dumping jumping FDI was at least part of the export firm's cost advantage to be transferred abroad and the fixed cost of outward FDI was less than the critical fixed cost in case of antidumping duty.If its cost advantage couldn't be transferred completely or the fixed cost of outward FDI was too high,no matter what antidumping measures to be taken,the export firm wouldn't choose outward FDI.
出处
《经济管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第14期72-79,共8页
Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
