期刊文献+

人造物概念的表征:功能、意图和目的论的解释 被引量:4

Representation of Artifacts’ Concepts: Function, Intention, and Teleological Explanation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以概念结构研究从“相似”到“解释”的理论转向为背景,评述人造物领域的“意图-历史论”(Bloom,1996),提出人造物概念结构中自上而下的约束是来自“使用目的”而不是“设计意图”。分析近期报告的大量实验,最后提出人造物概念表征的“基于使用的目的论”的解释模式和人造物归类的双重目标模型。 This paper proposed that “using-goal” instead of “intended design” as the top-down constraints in representation of artifact concepts after reviewing intentional-historical theory (Bloom, 1996) of artifact concepts and its evidences reported recently. Basing on analysis on experiments reported recently, a using-based teleological explanatory mode for representation of artifact concepts and a dual-goal model for artifacts’ categorization were advanced.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第4期466-478,共13页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 中国科技部973项目(2002CB312103) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(60433030) 面上项目(30270466) 中国科学院心理研究所创新重点项目(0302037)经费支持。
关键词 概念结构 人造物 意图 功能 目的论 基于解释的理论 Conceptual structure, Artifacts, intention, function, teleology, explanation-based theory.
  • 相关文献

参考文献71

  • 1Markman A B. Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ,US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1999
  • 2Markman A B, Ross B H. Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, 129(4): 592~613
  • 3Medin D L, Lynch E B, Solomon K O. Are there kinds of concepts? Annual Review of Psychology, 2000, 51:121~147
  • 4Caramazza A, Shelton J R. Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1998, 10(1): 1~34
  • 5Caramazza A, Mahon B. The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7(8): 354~361
  • 6Mahon B Z, Caramazza A. There are facts...and then there are facts: Reply to Moss and Tyler. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003, 7(11): 481~482
  • 7Mahon B Z, Caramazza A. Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2003, 20(3-6):433~450
  • 8Mandler J M. Thought before language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004, 8:508~513
  • 9Tyler L, Moss H. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2001,5(6): 244~252
  • 10Rogers T T, Lambon Ralph M A, Garrard P, Bozeat S,McClelland J L, Hodges J R, Patterson K. Structure and Deterioration of Semantic Memory: A Neuropsychological and Computational Investigation* 1. Psychological Review,2004, 111(1): 205~235

同被引文献55

  • 1SUN Yuhao,WANG Zhe,FU Xiaolan.The specific contribution of object's origin on artifacts categorization[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2006,51(23):2851-2859. 被引量:3
  • 2Medin D L,Lynch E B,Solomon K O.Are there kinds of concepts?Annu Rev Psychol,2000,51:121-147
  • 3Murphy G L.The Big Book of Concepts.Cambridge,US:MIT Press,2002
  • 4Markman A B.Knowledge Representation.Mahwah,US:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Publishers,1999
  • 5Markman A B,Ross B H.Category use and category learning.Psychol Bull,2003,129(4):592-613
  • 6Medin D L.Concepts and conceptual structure.Am Psychol,1989,44(12):1469-1481
  • 7Medin D L,Ortony A.Psychological essentialism.In:Vosniadou S,Ortonys A,eds.Similarity and Analogical Reasoning.New York:Cambridge University Press,1989.179-195
  • 8Murphy G L,Medin D L.The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychol Rev,1985,92(3):289-316
  • 9Komatsu L K.Recent views of conceptual structure.Psychol Bull,1992,112(3):500-526
  • 10Rips L J.Necessity and natural categories.Psychol Bull,2001,127(6):827-852

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部