2Hunter SB, Vauterin P, Lambert-Fair MA, et al. Establishment of a universal size standard strain for use with the PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols : converting the national databases to the new size standard. J Clin Microbiol, 2005,43 : 1045-1050.
3Cooper KL, Luey CK, Bird M, et al. Development and validation of a PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Vibrio cholerae. Foodborne Pathog Dis,2006,3: 51-58.
4TenoverFC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strains typing. J Clin Microbiol, 1995, 33:2233-2239.
5Kotetishvili M, Stine OC, Chen Y, et al. Multilocus sequence typing has better discriminatory ability for typing Vibrio cholerae than does pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and provides a measure of phylogenetic relatedness. J Clin Microbiol, 2003,41:2191-2196.
6Kam KM, Lucy CK, Tsang YM, et al. Molecular subtyping of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in Hong Kong: correlation with epidemiological events from 1994 to 2002. J Clin Microbiol, 2003,41:4502-4511.
7Pichel M, Rivas M, Chinen I, et al. Genetic diversity of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Argentina and emergence of a new variant. J Clin Microbiol, 2003,41 : 124- 134.
