摘要
清人对《花间集》的接受趋于理性化。清初云间余脉以及西陵、柳洲等派词人所作不脱《花间》风气,扬州词人则对《花间集》作出了合理的定位。浙派鼻祖朱彝尊早年喜《花间集》而晚年有所变化,其他浙派词人大多对其加以肯定。常州词人张惠言、陈廷焯推崇温庭筠而批判《花间集》的主张并不合理,故况周颐等人对此作出了修正。
The people of Qing Dynasty took a reasonable attitude on the acceptance of Hua Jian Ji. What the remaining person of Yunjian Ci School,and those poets of Xiling and Liuzhou were influenced by Hua Jian Ji. Ci poets of Yangzhou were deserved for their reasonable views on it. Zhu Yizun' s appreciation to it changed in his later age. Other Ci poets of Zhexi upholded a positive point. Zhang Huiyan and Chen Tingzhuo canonized Wen Tingyun and criticized it. The standpoint was irrationality, so other Ci poets of Changzhou amended it, such as Kuang Zhouyi.
出处
《南阳师范学院学报》
CAS
2005年第7期65-68,共4页
Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
花间集
清人
接受
Hua Jian Ji
people of the Qing Dynasty
acceptance