浙江大学竺可桢学院和农生学院02级男生MMPI测查结果分析与比较

Analysis and Comparsion of MMPI Testing Result on men of 02 Grade at Zhukezhen Honors College and the School of Agriculture and Biotechnology Zhejiang Univercity

目的 了解浙江大学竺可桢学院和农业与生物技术学院的大学生心理特征、心理问题及适应状况,探讨两学院大学生的综合能力、发展潜在能力及其差异,为大学生的培养管理提供心理学依据.方法 采用明尼苏达多项人格因素测定量表(MMPI-2)对浙江大学2002级竺可桢学院和农业与生物技术学院的男学生进行心理学检测,其中竺可桢学院231名,农业与生物技术学院84名,年龄18～22岁,对两组学生进行统计学分析与比较.结果 农业与生物技术学院组Sc(精神分裂)高于竺可桢学院组,表明该院学生有孤独、不被理解、神经质性紧张、行为退缩、情感脆弱、对人天真、缺乏家庭温暖、学习与生活负担过度等现象;竺可桢学院组F(诈病量表)、Si(社会向性)高于农业与生物技术学院组,表明该院学生存在内向、害羞、伪装、掩饰、个体整合性差的个性特征.结论 浙大竺可桢学院和农业与生物技术学院学生存在各自不同的心理状况;明尼苏达多项人格因素测定量表(MMPI-2)作为心理测试是比较准确的,能客观反映大学生心理状况,对于测查学生的心理健康很有实用价值.

Objective This paper aims to analyze the psychological characteristics, problems and the state of adaptation in college students at Zhu Kezhen Honors College and the School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, P.R.China.Comprehensive abilities and potential abilities for further development are also dealt with in the students at these two schools. The study is expected to provide the psychological evidence for improving the student management work. Method Minnesota Multiple Personality Inventory-(MMPI-2)was used to carry out this psychological investigation of the male students at these tow colleges. 231 students at Chu Kechen Honors College, and 84 students at the School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, all aged 18-22, participated in the study. Data were subjected to statistical analysis and comparison. Results The Sc of the students at the School of Agriculture and Biotechnology is higher than that of the students at Zhu Kezhen Honors College, indicating that the students at the former school are characterized by such feelings as loneliness, sense of not being understood, nervousness, cowardliness, psychological frailties, naivety, lack of care from the family, and heavy burden form study and life. The F and Si of the students from Zhu Kezhen Honors College are higher than that of the students from the School of Agriculture and Biotechnology, indicating that the students from that college exhibit such personal atteibutes as introversion, shyness, feignedness, concealment of one’s true feelings, and lack of management skills of one’s own affairs. Conclusion The findings show different psychological states of the students at these two colleges. As a tool for psychological measurement, the MMPI-2 is accurate and is capable of reflecting college students’psychological state. It proves to have practical value in measuring students’psychological health.